advertiser banner advertiser banner advertiser banner advertiser banner
Digital Issues

Home >  News >  February, 2014

Study: Regional Anesthesia Does Not Increase Chance of Falling

Research suggests spinal and epidural anesthesia, peripheral nerve blocks safe to use in knee replacement surgery.

Published: February 19, 2014

Could a study based on nearly 200,000 patient records topple the long-held belief that regional anesthesia makes patients more prone to falls in the first days after having knee replacement surgery?

The popular thinking is that regional anesthesia for knee replacement may cause motor weakness, making patients more likely to fall when they're walking in the first days after surgery. But the study in the March issue of Anesthesiology finds that the chance of falling after knee replacement does not increase with epidurals and peripheral nerve blocks.

The study goes so far as to suggest that neuraxial anesthesia and blocks provide better pain control and lead to faster rehabilitation and fewer complications than general anesthesia.

"We found that not only do these types of anesthesia not increase the risk of falls, but also spinal or epidural anesthesia may even decrease the risk compared to general anesthesia," says Stavros G. Memtsoudis, MD, PhD, professor of anesthesiology and public health and director of critical care services at the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York, N.Y., and lead author of the study. "This work suggests that fear of in-hospital falls is not a reason to avoid regional anesthesia for orthopedic surgery."

Researchers analyzed the types of anesthesia used in 191,570 knee replacement surgeries: 76.2% of patients had general anesthesia, 10.9% had spinal or epidural anesthesia, and 12.9% had a combination of neuraxial and general anesthesia. In addition, 12.1% of all patients had peripheral nerve block. When researchers then analyzed the type of anesthesia used for those who fell in the hospital, they found little variance. Of patients who had general anesthesia, 1.62% fell, compared to 1.3% of those who had neuraxial anesthesia, and 1.5% who had general and neuraxial anesthesia. Patients who also received a peripheral nerve block had a fall rate of 1.58%.

Dan O'Connor


Also in the News...

Olympus Issues New Duodenoscope Reprocessing Instructions
Weather or Not
Dentist Accused of Leaving Sedated Kids Alone
244 ASCs Will Be Part of Tenet-USPI Joint Venture
HHS Suggests CMS Implement Site-Neutral Payments for Outpatient Surgery
Sugammadex FDA Approval Pushed Back Again
Patient Sues, Claims She Was Raped During Colonoscopy

 
Have an account? Please log in:
Email Address:
  Remember my login on this computer

DID YOU SEE THIS?
Illumination

Surgeons Adore This Headlight

Other Articles That May Interest You

Are Continuous Nerve Blocks Worth the Trouble?

The benefits of pain catheters outweigh the drawbacks.

Regional Anesthesia's Economic Advantages

Peripheral nerve blocks save dollars and make sense.

Anesthesia Alert

Are Older Patients Getting Too Much Anesthesia?