advertiser banner advertiser banner advertiser banner
Digital Issues

Home >  News >  January, 2014

Fatal Cataract Sedation Results in $2.1M Settlement

Patient "inexplicably left alone" and unmonitored before surgery.

Published: January 24, 2014

The estate of a cataract patient whose routine sedation was fatally complicated by negligent monitoring has agreed to a $2.1 million settlement, according to Jury Verdict Review Publications.

Marie Golubski, then 68, was scheduled to undergo cataract surgery on her right eye at the Pittsburgh-area Associates Surgery Center in June 2010. She was prepped and intravenously sedated before being "inexplicably left alone."

During this time her breathing slowed significantly and the medical staff, having neglected to monitor her vital signs, failed to notice that she had fallen into respiratory and cardiac arrest. Twenty-three minutes after the IV sedation had been administered, she was discovered unresponsive and suffering anoxic brain injury, according to court records. She was transferred to a nearby hospital for resuscitative efforts, but died 6 days later.

Ms. Golubski's husband filed suit, citing negligence in failing to monitor her, failing to provide continuous care and leaving her unattended after sedation. The defendants denied negligence. According to a case summary, ophthalmic surgeon Daniel Zimmer, MD, and anesthesia provider Brian Cross, CRNA, each argued that monitoring was the other's responsibility.

In the August 2013 settlement, however, Dr. Zimmer, Mr. Cross, the surgery center and Dr. Zimmer's practice settled the case for a total of $2,125,000 in damages.

Attorneys for Ms. Golubski's estate and the defendants did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

David Bernard


Also in the News...

1 in 10 Healthcare Workers Abuse Drugs
Was TV News Report About Surgeon Libelous?
Doc Accused of Slapping Sedated Patients So Hard He'd Sometimes Leave Red Marks
FDA Approves Upgraded Surgical Robot
Another Reason Why You Should Ban Smart Phones From the OR
Transition to ICD-10 Delayed Again
Did United Use Phony Excuses and Delay Tactics to Avoid Lap-Band Payments?

 
Have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
DID YOU SEE THIS?
Patient and Employee Safety

Keep Patients Safe With These Economical Skin Markers

advertiser banner

Other Articles That May Interest You

Can Facilities Really Profit From Anesthesia Services?

You're likely in harm's way if you're billing and collecting for your anesthesia providers.

Aetna Sues NJ ASC Over Out-of-Network Practices

Insurer claims it has overpaid $10M as a result

Can You Trust Your Biological Indicators?

Advanced Sterilization Products Penalized $1.25M for Distributing Sterrad Sterilization Indicators with Inaccurate Expiration Dates