advertiser banner advertiser banner advertiser banner
Digital Issues

Home >  News >  July, 2014

Anesthesia Hand Hygiene Compliance is Least When Needed Most

Providers wash hands less often during induction and emergence.

Published: July 1, 2014

During surgery, anesthesia providers are more likely to wash their hands during periods of time when there's less threat of bacterial contamination, and less likely when the threat is greater, a study published in the July issue of the American Journal of Infection Control suggests. The study also notes that it would be impossible for providers to completely comply with hand hygiene practices recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), because there isn't enough time to do so.

The study involved 2 sets of surgical procedures, with 5 surgeries in each. During the first set, researchers observed that the lowest compliance rates came during what were defined as the induction phases (the first 20 minutes of each) and the emergence phases (the last 20 minutes). The highest compliance rates came during the 30-minute period between induction and emergence.

During the second set of procedures, the researchers took cultures at various intervals from 20 surfaces that had been identified during the first set as those in the anesthesia work environment that were most frequently touched — the bed, the pen, the anesthesia cart second drawer handle and so on. They found that the sharpest increases in contamination occurred "during the complex and rapidly evolving induction and emergence phases," the times when anesthesia providers find it most challenging to follow hand hygiene guidelines and are least likely to do so.

WHO guidelines specify 5 hand-hygiene moments: (1) before touching a patient; (2) before a clean procedure; (3) after exposure to body fluids; (4) after touching a patient; and (5) after touching a patient's surroundings. Providers were most likely to wash their hands after a potential body fluid exposure, and least likely before patient contact or after contact with the environment. The researchers note, however, that the mean total number of WHO opportunities observed per hour was 149, meaning that total compliance would have consumed more time than was available.

The results, say the authors, suggest that improving compliance "may require development and implementation of novel approaches."

Jim Burger


Also in the News...

Orthopedic Surgeon from Indiana Plotted to Kill Ex-Wife
Medicare's Colonoscopy Loophole Could Cost Your Patients
Hospital Accused of Medicare Fraud Will Repay $750K
Doc Threatens Physician's Assistant During Open Heart Surgery: "I'm Going to Put You Through the Wall"
Did Negligence Let RN Steal Patients' Pain Meds?
Hospitals Across the Country Vary Substantially in Their Use of Laparoscopy
"Insensitive" Post Costs Nurse Her Job

 
Have an account? Please log in:
Email Address:
  Remember my login on this computer

DID YOU SEE THIS?
Airway Management

Intubation is Easier With Titanium

advertiser banner

Other Articles That May Interest You

3 Sure-Fire Steps to Standardized Preps

How we secured frontline buy-in and ensure continued compliance.

3 Steps to Effective Room Disinfection

Take a Proactive Approach Against MRSA

Study advocates aggressive patient treatment over screening and isolation.