Home >  News >  March, 2017

Is Facility Responsible for Swallowed Dental Bridge During Surgery?

Hospital says standard of care wasn't breached.

Published: March 31, 2017

HARD TO SWALLOW The dental bridge that took a 6-day journey through a patient's digestive tract

Patients need to be made aware that a challenging intubation can damage teeth, but how much damage is reasonable? What if a patient comes out of surgery looking as if he was on the losing end of a barroom brawl?

When 60-year-old Richard Martins of Linden, N.J., woke up from revision knee surgery last August, he discovered he was missing something — a permanent bridge that comprised his 3 front teeth — a development, he says, his anesthesiologist had failed to notice. He also says he'd told the anesthesiologist that he had 2 permanent bridges.

Staff searched the OR and PACU, but found nothing. Eventually, an X-ray confirmed everyone's worst fear. The bridge had been knocked completely out, he'd swallowed it, and it was now slowly making its way through his digestive tract.

Six days later, while he was still in the unidentified hospital, it finally passed without complications, but it had broken beyond repair, and a new one eventually had to be installed. The bill for the root canal and new bridge: $9,080.

Now what?

Mr. Martins tells Bamboozled, a consumer advocate service of NJ.com, that no one was in a hurry to step up and take responsibility. "The anesthesiologist told me that I might have bit down on the device in my mouth while I was unconscious," he says. Meanwhile, the hospital's patient relations rep, whom he spoke to twice, was noncommittal.

Next, his dentist's office said it didn't think his insurance would cover the bill, so it called the anesthesiology practice, which said it wouldn't pay either. Finally, a month later, he got a letter from the hospital: "It was determined that there was no deviation in the standard of care, therefore [the anesthesiology practice] respectfully declined to reimburse you for any dental repairs."

Fortunately, the story has a happy ending. When his dentist's office was nudged into actually submitting a claim, it turned out that between Mr. Martins's dental and medical insurance, he was covered, save for a $30 co-pay.

But some questions remain unanswered. Should the anesthesiologist have examined his teeth both before and after intubation? Should a mouth guard have been used? Was there really no deviation from the standard of care? What do you think?

Jim Burger


Also in the News...

Senator Creates Firestorm With Nurses Playing Cards Comment
Suspect Logged Into Electronic Prescription Program as Ophthalmologist to Fraudulently Issue Opioid Scripts
Marijuana Users May Need Higher Doses of Sedatives Before Endoscopy
Brainlab Recalls Spine & Trauma 3D Navigation 1.0 Software Due to Display Inaccuracies
FDA Orders Withdrawal Of Transvaginal Surgical Mesh From Market
Lawsuit: When PACU Lights Dimmed, Doc Asked Wife to Hold Penlight on Her Husband's Leaking JP Drain
R.I. Smoke Evacuation Legislation Becomes Law

New to Outpatient Surgery Magazine?
Sign-up to continue reading this article.
Register Now
Have an account? Please log in:
Email Address:
  Remember my login on this computer

advertiser banner

Other Articles That May Interest You

Medical Malpractice: Going Off-Label Can Cost You Big-Time

$14.9 million for patient paralyzed by epidural corticosteroid injection.

Did Hospital Reuse HIV Patient's Syringe to Administer Anesthesia?

Medical Malpractice: Charting Through the EHR MedMal Minefield

5 legal danger zones unique to electronic documentation