Home >  News >  March, 2017

Is Facility Responsible for Swallowed Dental Bridge During Surgery?

Hospital says standard of care wasn't breached.

Published: March 31, 2017

HARD TO SWALLOW The dental bridge that took a 6-day journey through a patient's digestive tract

Patients need to be made aware that a challenging intubation can damage teeth, but how much damage is reasonable? What if a patient comes out of surgery looking as if he was on the losing end of a barroom brawl?

When 60-year-old Richard Martins of Linden, N.J., woke up from revision knee surgery last August, he discovered he was missing something — a permanent bridge that comprised his 3 front teeth — a development, he says, his anesthesiologist had failed to notice. He also says he'd told the anesthesiologist that he had 2 permanent bridges.

Staff searched the OR and PACU, but found nothing. Eventually, an X-ray confirmed everyone's worst fear. The bridge had been knocked completely out, he'd swallowed it, and it was now slowly making its way through his digestive tract.

Six days later, while he was still in the unidentified hospital, it finally passed without complications, but it had broken beyond repair, and a new one eventually had to be installed. The bill for the root canal and new bridge: $9,080.

Now what?

Mr. Martins tells Bamboozled, a consumer advocate service of NJ.com, that no one was in a hurry to step up and take responsibility. "The anesthesiologist told me that I might have bit down on the device in my mouth while I was unconscious," he says. Meanwhile, the hospital's patient relations rep, whom he spoke to twice, was noncommittal.

Next, his dentist's office said it didn't think his insurance would cover the bill, so it called the anesthesiology practice, which said it wouldn't pay either. Finally, a month later, he got a letter from the hospital: "It was determined that there was no deviation in the standard of care, therefore [the anesthesiology practice] respectfully declined to reimburse you for any dental repairs."

Fortunately, the story has a happy ending. When his dentist's office was nudged into actually submitting a claim, it turned out that between Mr. Martins's dental and medical insurance, he was covered, save for a $30 co-pay.

But some questions remain unanswered. Should the anesthesiologist have examined his teeth both before and after intubation? Should a mouth guard have been used? Was there really no deviation from the standard of care? What do you think?

Jim Burger


Also in the News...

Study: C. Diff Transmission "Might Be More Likely to Occur" in Surgical Centers
Chicago Hospital Sues Leapfrog for Defamation Over Low Patient Safety Grade
Recall: Midazolam Syringes in Blister Packs Contain Syringes of Ondansetron
Study: Overlapping Surgeries Are Safe for Patients
Coughing Fit During Cataract Surgery Costs Patient Her Vision in 1 Eye; Docs Shell Out $1.35M
Mölnlycke Sues Smith & Nephew Over 'False and Deceptive' Claims About Its Wound Dressings
Lawsuit Over Left-Behind Ligating Clip Can Proceed

New to Outpatient Surgery Magazine?
Sign-up to continue reading this article.
Register Now
Have an account? Please log in:
Email Address:
  Remember my login on this computer

advertiser banner

Other Articles That May Interest You

Medical Malpractice: In an Adverse Event, Honesty Is the Best Policy

Open communication is the key to avoiding liability claims.

Hospital Hit With $5M Verdict After Lap Chole Patient's Post-Discharge Death

Woman, 49, died after she was discharged the same day she underwent an emergency gallbladder removal at a Philadelphia hospital.

Medical Malpractice: Don't Get Tripped Up With These EHR Errors

A simple typo could still put you at risk of a negligence lawsuit.