advertiser banner advertiser banner advertiser banner advertiser banner
Digital Issues

Home >  News >  August, 2013

Duke Docs Who Attached Intestine to Vagina Must Stand Trial

Appeals court scoffs at claim that case is too complex for lay jury to grasp.

Published: August 27, 2013

The highly technical nature of most surgeries may make it challenging for laypeople to determine malpractice — as accepted legal doctrine holds — but some bodily functions are clear enough that just about anyone can make the right judgments.

So says the North Carolina Court of Appeals, which reversed a lower court's decision to dismiss a malpractice suit against Duke University Health Systems and 2 doctors who, after surgery to remove a section of small intestine, attached the plaintiff's intestine to her vagina instead of reattaching it to her rectum, according to an account in the (Durham, N.C.) Herald-Sun.

The hospital, along with Christopher Mantyh, MD, and Erich S. Huang, MD, had argued that the case should be dismissed because legal doctrine holds that most medical treatment involves certain risks and only an expert can determine whether a poor outcome rises to the level of malpractice. Dr. Mantyh, the chief of gastrointestinal and colorectal surgery at the hospital, performed the surgery, assisted by Dr. Huang, a general surgery resident.

Durham County Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson agreed, tossing the case, but that decision was overruled by the Court of Appeals, which noted that another judge had already refused a motion to dismiss and that "one judge may not reconsider the legal conclusions of another judge."

Further, the Court of Appeals said, despite the technical nature of surgery, it's "common knowledge and experience that intestines are meant to connect with the anus, not the vagina, even following a surgical procedure to correct a bowel problem."

The appeals court upheld Judge Hudson's decision to dismiss punitive claims, saying there was no evidence that the defendants' conduct was willful, wanton, malicious or fraudulent.

Jim Burger


Also in the News...

Olympus Issues New Duodenoscope Reprocessing Instructions
Weather or Not
Dentist Accused of Leaving Sedated Kids Alone
244 ASCs Will Be Part of Tenet-USPI Joint Venture
HHS Suggests CMS Implement Site-Neutral Payments for Outpatient Surgery
Sugammadex FDA Approval Pushed Back Again
Patient Sues, Claims She Was Raped During Colonoscopy

 
Have an account? Please log in:
Email Address:
  Remember my login on this computer

DID YOU SEE THIS?
Patient Warming

Fluid and Blanket Warming Made Much Easier

advertiser banner

Other Articles That May Interest You

Could This App Reduce Malpractice Claims?

Medical Malpractice: Don't Give in to the Gadget

Distracted doctoring is the new legal minefield.

Medical Malpractice: Are You Getting the Full Picture on Your Docs?

You have to look long and hard to verify a physician's credentials.