Home >  News >  November, 2017

Study: Overlapping Surgeries Are Safe for Patients

A study of more than 2,000 neurosurgery patients showed no major difference in post-op complications between overlapping and non-overlapping surgeries.

Published: November 8, 2017

EFFICIENCY A JAMA study gives evidence to support the argument that overlapping surgeries don't pose a safety risk for patients.

A study that found that neurosurgery patients didn't suffer serious post-op side effects following overlapping surgeries supports the safety of concurrent surgeries, the increasingly popular and somewhat controversial practice during which the same primary surgeon performs 2 cases in different operating rooms — with the start of one surgery overlapping with the end of another.

The study, the results of which were published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), was conducted on 2,275 neurosurgery patients from the beginning of 2014 through 2015 at Emory University Hospital in Atlanta, Ga.

Researchers compared the health of patients who'd been scheduled for overlapping surgeries with those who were scheduled to remain with their surgeon through the entire procedure, taking into account deaths, complications and patient functional status in the 90 days following their operations. Researchers concluded that patients were not at any more risk of serious side effects following overlapping surgeries than they would be following non-overlapping surgeries.

Researchers also detailed the different types of overlapping surgeries by dividing operations into 3 basic stages — preparation, surgery and emergence. In one scenario, the second patient would be scheduled for preparation during the first patient's emergence phase. In another, the second patient would start preparation during the first patient's surgery — but after the critical portion of that surgery. In the final scenario, the doctor would begin surgery on the second patient immediately following the critical portion of the first patient's surgery.

The findings were published in the midst of debate surrounding the possible safety risks of scheduling overlapping operations. An article published in JAMA in July titled, "The Evolving Story of Overlapping Surgery," argued that the parameters of, "the critical portion," of surgery have not officially been set and that many patients are suspicious of the practice, if they're aware it happens at all.

"[Concurrent surgery] can increase efficiency and allow the expertise of an individual neurosurgeon to be more widely available," writes David Hoyt, MD, FACS, the executive director of the American College of Surgeons, in an accompanying commentary.

Anna Merriman

Also in the News...

Senator Creates Firestorm With Nurses Playing Cards Comment
Suspect Logged Into Electronic Prescription Program as Ophthalmologist to Fraudulently Issue Opioid Scripts
Marijuana Users May Need Higher Doses of Sedatives Before Endoscopy
Brainlab Recalls Spine & Trauma 3D Navigation 1.0 Software Due to Display Inaccuracies
FDA Orders Withdrawal Of Transvaginal Surgical Mesh From Market
Lawsuit: When PACU Lights Dimmed, Doc Asked Wife to Hold Penlight on Her Husband's Leaking JP Drain
R.I. Smoke Evacuation Legislation Becomes Law

New to Outpatient Surgery Magazine?
Sign-up to continue reading this article.
Register Now
Have an account? Please log in:
Email Address:
  Remember my login on this computer

advertiser banner

Other Articles That May Interest You

Study Examines the Ergonomics of Surgery and its Adverse Effects on Physicians

A JAMA analysis of 21 studies shows that surgeons are at risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders due to the way they stand and equipment they use.