 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisement |
|
 |
|
| Advertisement |
|
 |
|
| Advertisement |
|
 |
|
| Advertisement |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pain Researcher Faked 21 Studies |
|
A prominent Massachusetts anesthesiologist who greatly influenced how post-surgical pain in orthopedics is treated has admitted fabricating the results of 21 studies published between 1996 and 2008.
Scott Reuben, MD, a researcher at Tufts University's Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass., falsified the clinical trials supporting studies published in anesthesiology, pain and orthopedic surgery journals, according to Anesthesiology News, which reported news of an investigation into the matter earlier this month.
Problems with Dr. Reuben's research were discovered last year during a routine audit by the medical center. A follow-up investigation found 21 faked studies and cast dozens more into question. "He was one of the most prolific investigators in the area of postoperative pain management," says Steven Shafer, MD, editor-in-chief of the journal Anesthesia & Analgesia. This "sets back our knowledge in the field tremendously." The journal published 10 articles based on the faked data, which it plans to retract.
In his articles, Dr. Reuben, who was a member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau and who received research grants from the drug firm, encouraged orthopedic surgeons to switch from generic first generation NSAIDs to proprietary COX-2 inhibitors to control post-surgical pain. Some of the drugs Dr. Reuben touted, such as Pfizer's Bextra and Merck's Vioxx, have been withdrawn from the U.S. market because of safety concerns.
Additionally, some patients may have experienced delayed recovery as a direct result of Dr. Reuben's fabrications, says Dr. Shafer. "We are talking about millions of patients worldwide, where postoperative pain management has been affected by the research findings of Dr. Reuben."
Dr. Reuben's lawyer told reporters that the anesthesiologist "deeply regrets that all of this happened."
Kent Steinriede |
|
© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here. |
|
 |
^ Back to Top |
|
|
|
|
| Nevada Investigation Reveals More Errors |
|
A recent investigation conducted in the wake of last year's hepatitis C outbreak has revealed that 25 of 49 Nevada ASCs reviewed failed to practice adequate infection control practices, according to state health authorities.
Investigators say close to one-third of the infractions involved the misuse of single-use devices, while sterilization and disinfection errors accounted for nearly half, according to a published report.
In the report, Marla McDade Williams, chief of Nevada's bureau of healthcare quality and compliance, is calling for inspections of the state's ASCs every 18 months instead of once every seven years, as mandated by current CMS regulations. It also notes that lawmakers have proposed annual inspections of the state's ASCs and office surgery suites.
State health officials shut down the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada in Las Vegas last year while investigating six hepatitis C cases allegedly contracted at the center. They discovered that the center had reused syringes, single-use vials of anesthesia and scope-cleaning solution. Since then, the state has recommended hepatitis C and HIV tests for over 50,000 patients as a result of nine cases of hepatitis C linked to two facilities.
Daniel Cook |
|
© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here. |
|
 |
^ Back to Top |
|
|
|
|
| ACG Updates Screening Guidelines |
|
The American College of Gastroenterology has updated its screening guidelines for colorectal cancer for the first time since 2000, recommending that patients undergo colonoscopies every 10 years, beginning at age 50.
The ACG guidelines differ from one developed by the Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer in its designation of colonoscopy as the "preferred" strategy for screening, rather than one of a "menu of options." The organization explains that it based this decision on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy as well as patients' attitudes toward the procedure.
"A preferred strategy simplifies and shortens discussion with patients and could increase the likelihood that screening is offered to patients," says ACG president Eamonn M.M. Quigley, MD, FACG.
Despite this recommendation, the organization acknowledges that "not all eligible persons are willing to undergo colonoscopy for screening purposes" and suggests that these patients be offered alternative prevention tests, such as flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 to 10 years or CT colonography every 5 years.
The new guidelines also advise:
colonoscopies for African-American patients to begin at age 45 instead of 50,
a "split dosing" bowel prep strategy, in which half the dose is given on the day of the procedure, to improve the quality of colonoscopy screenings, and
annual fecal immunochemical testing as the preferred test for colorectal cancer detection.
The guidelines have been published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology as well as on the ACG's Web site.
Irene Tsikitas |
|
© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here. |
|
 |
^ Back to Top |
|
|
|
|
| News & Notes |
|
Tip of the week The outpatient staff at the Community Hospital of Long Beach in Long Beach, Calif., tape a note to the cover of each patient's chart that lists their post-op contact's name as well as whether they'll be waiting in the lobby or waiting for a call on their cell phone. "Feedback from my surgeons has been great," says Patricia L. Eckenroth, RN. "They no longer have to dig through the chart to find next-of-kin contact info and the ease of finding this information has increased the likelihood of our surgeons taking the time to contact patients' families and friends."
Anesthesia billing fraud The U.S. Department of Defense is investigating a husband and wife team of gastroenterologists suspected of scamming $195,000 from the federal Tricare insurance program for current and retired members of the armed services and their families. Kandarp Shah, MD, and Kalyani Shah, MD, operated the Medical Diagnostic and Treatment Center in Virginia Beach, Va., between 2003 and 2008, during which time they allegedly billed for sedated colonoscopies while performing the procedures without sedation, says a published report. No criminal charges have been filed against the couple, who are now practicing in Fresno, Calif.
Powder-free gloves safer? Latex gloves manufactured without cornstarch powder are more likely to provoke latex allergies than those produced with powder, according to a study conducted by the Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania and published in the journal Dermatitis. Four years after the health system's clinicians transitioned from powdered gloves to powder-free gloves, the number of workers' compensation claims associated with latex fell from 12 per year to 4.5 per year and the average workers' compensation payment to employees dropped from $34,789 to $2,505, which offset the added expense of purchasing powder-free gloves, the study claims. |
|
© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here. |
|
|
^ Back to Top |
|
|
|
|
|