|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Joint Commission Site Hosts Patient Satisfaction Data |
|
Wondering how patients feel about the care they receive at your facility or a neighboring one? Now you can access patient satisfaction information through the Joint Commission's Quality Check Web site.
The accreditation agency began posting data from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems on the site this month. Quality Check already houses information about healthcare facilities' accreditation status and compliance with National Patient Safety Goals and National Quality Improvement Goals.
The CAHPS data adds patient satisfaction to the mix, allowing users to view patients' assessments of their communication with doctors and nurses, a facility's cleanliness and atmosphere, pain management efforts and discharge information. The Joint Commission says it will update the information quarterly. Quality Check users can search healthcare organizations by name, Zip code or state.
Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems is a program sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to develop standardized surveys to gauge patients' experiences at healthcare facilities. Its information is also available from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital Compare Web site.
Irene Tsikitas |
|
 |
^ Back to Top |
|
|
|
|
| Cash-strapped Hospitals Put Needed Improvements on Hold |
|
The American Hospital Association says eight out of 10 hospitals it has surveyed blame the slumping economy for delaying such necessary projects as facility upgrades and clinical improvement and IT improvements.
The 639 hospitals surveyed in December 2008 and January 2009 reported increased difficulties in borrowing funds through tax-exempt bonds and bank loans and also a slowing of philanthropic donations. In the meantime, Wall Street's troubles have drained hospitals' savings, reports the AHA.
Close to half of the hospitals surveyed say the inability to secure funding has resulted in the postponement of facility improvement projects slated to begin within the next six months or the delay of projects already in progress. The survey notes 65 percent of hospitals polled say the projects put on hold were intended to improve surgical and inpatient care.
"Stopping these projects also means new jobs are not created within the healthcare field or for construction workers, contractors, IT specialists and others," says AHA president and CEO Rich Umbdenstock. "The ripple effects of the capital crunch on employment are cause for great concern."
The AHA says postponing facility upgrades makes it difficult to improve quality of care, efficiency and coordination of care, which jeopardizes hospitals' abilities to meet the healthcare needs of the communities they serve.
Daniel Cook |
|
 |
^ Back to Top |
|
|
|
|
| Partial Knee Replacement: More Than a Quick Fix |
|
While unicompartmental knee replacement is often seen as a temporary treatment for older patients with osteoarthritis, it shows better results 15 years post-surgery than total replacement, according to a study from the Avon Orthopaedic Centre in Bristol, England.
"The results for UKR are as good as those for TKR and show no greater tendency to fail for at least 15 years," write the authors, who followed 94 patients for 15 years and reported their results in the January issue of the Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British edition.
Patients in the UKR group saw fewer complications and a better range of motion, and fewer required revision surgery. At 15 years, 10.1 percent of UKRs had been revised, as compared to 21.3 percent of TKR procedures.
"There is no doubt that a good UKR is better than a good TKR from the point of view of function," writes Robin Allum, FRCS, a consultant orthopedic surgeon at Wexham Park Hospital in Berkshire, U.K., in an accompanying commentary. "TKR however is on the whole a reliable procedure that gives adequate results."
He noted that the results are based on just 94 patients, in contrast to shorter-term joint registry studies of as many as 80,697 patients that provide differing results.
Kent Steinriede |
|
 |
^ Back to Top |
|
|
|
|
| Instapoll: Accreditation Surveyors Generally Thorough Enough |
|
If you're like most of the 31 readers who answered last week's online poll, accreditation surveyors are, for the most part, inspecting your facility thoroughly but not going overboard. When asked to rate their last accreditation survey, 58 percent rated the level of inspection as "just right," 32 percent said it was "too picky" and 10 percent said it "wasn't picky enough."
This week poll asks how many GPOs your facility belongs to. Go to our front page to participate in the poll and view real-time results.
Dan O'Connor |
|
 |
^ Back to Top |
|
|
|
|
| News & Notes |
|
Tip of the week "Ever go to the supply room to pull an item and find out that you're out of stock?" wrote Joyce Danels, RN, CNOR, of Twin Rivers Regional Medical Center in Kennett, Mo., in our January 2006 issue. "My staff of RNs and scrub techs decided to divide responsibilities for the supplies among themselves." With individual staffers charged with checking, setting levels for and requesting orders of ophthalmic supplies, sutures, ENT necessities and other areas, "it's like having a whole team of materials managers."
Qualified for colonoscopies? In light of a perceived shortage of endoscopists to fill the nation's needs for colorectal cancer screenings, the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the American College of Gastroenterology and the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons report that qualified primary-care physicians meet the guidelines that could allow them to lend a hand in offering screenings. According to a meta-analysis published in the January/February issue of the Annals of Family Medicine, primary-care physicians have a reach-the-cecum rate of 89.2 percent (90 is the standard); an adenoma detection rate of 28.9 percent (surgical endoscopists have a rate of 34.2 percent); and a major complication rate of 0.04 percent (where less than 1 percent is the standard).
Is lumbar surgery worth it? Yes, when it involves spinal stenosis surgery, laminectomy or the surgical removal of soft bone and tissue. However, the cost is not worth the benefits in reduced back pain in patients with stenosis associated with slipped vertebrae, according to a multi-site study published in the Dec. 16 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine. Stenosis surgery with laminectomy cost $77,000 per quality-adjusted-life-year, says the study, while spinal fusion for stenosis with slipped vertebrae cost $115,000. The study noted a threshold of $100,000 for a procedure to be considered cost-effective. |
|
|
^ Back to Top |
|
|
|
|
|