Home >  News >  May, 2013

Aetna Sues NJ ASC Over Out-of-Network Practices

Insurer claims it has overpaid $10M as a result

Published: May 22, 2013

Aetna has sued a New Jersey ASC for "damages and treble damages based upon fraudulent and excessive billing," according to a filing in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The insurer claims it has overpaid Patient Care Associates, LLC, by $10 million as a result of PCA's "regularly submitt[ing] false and fraudulent health insurance claims … which misrepresent and inflate the actual charges for out-of-network services," says the suit.

According to court documents, physicians, some of whom hold financial interests in PCA, referred Aetna-covered patients to the ASC even though it's a non-participating center. "PCA and the physicians encourage patients to use PCA rather than a participating center and assure the patients that they will not be liable for any charges associated with the inappropriately charged out-of-network costs," says the suit.

Aetna claims that, from January 2010 to June 2012, it paid PCA approximately $10 million for these out-of-network procedures. The suit cites examples of what Aetna considers to be inflated charges: In May 2012, PCA submitted a bill for $83,778 for a knee arthroscopy (reimbursed at $6,973 by Medicare); in November 2011, PCA charged Aetna $193,831 for facet joint injections and ended up being paid $95,347 of that (Medicare reimbursement for the procedure is $405.90). The insurer is seeking to recover the overpayments, pre- and post-judgment interest, damages, lawyer's fees and costs of the suit.

A representative at PCA reached by phone said the facility had no comment. Request for comment from Aetna's legal representation was not returned.

Stephanie Wasek


Also in the News...

Lawsuit Over Left-Behind Ligating Clip Can Proceed
Police: Director of Surgery Center Tried to Traffic 28g of Fentanyl
A Look at Health Care's Reimbursement Future at ORX
At ORX, Why Open Disclosure Bests Deny and Defend
Study Finds Patients Fare Better When the Surgeon is Female
At ORX, The Case for Giving Disruptive Docs a Second Chance
ORX Attendees Learn Why Patients Come Second

New to Outpatient Surgery Magazine?
Sign-up to continue reading this article.
Register Now
Have an account? Please log in:
Email Address:
  Remember my login on this computer

advertiser banner

Other Articles That May Interest You

Ophthalmologist Sues Over "Unconstitutional" Certificate-of-Need Process

Lawsuit: Iowa's "burdensome" 40-year-old CON process — and intervention from nearby hospitals — has prevented eye surgeon from using his fully equipped surgery center.

Site-Neutrality Law Halts New Surgical Center

Patient's Fall Wasn't Hospital's Fault

Providers were not warned and were not expecting post-surgical collapse, court rules.