Subscriptions

Advertising

Resources

About Us

Contact Us

Create An Account Forgot Your Password?
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month E-Weekly Newsletter Building a Facility Article Archive Second Opinions
Search:
Benchmarking
General Surgery
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Building/Renovating
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20111003_Ansell_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120426_PDI_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120322_Soma_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20110124_ImageFirst_LB-154x100.gif
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

Malpractice Verdicts Often Favor Physicians

Physicians come out on the winning end of 80% of malpractice claims that end in jury verdicts, according to researchers at Massachusetts General Hos...

Study: CT Colongraphy Effective in Finding Polyps

A CT-scan-based, laxative-free "virtual colonoscopy" may be as effective as standard colonoscopy in finding potentially cancerous polyps, according ...

Wrong-Site Prevention Video Shows the Right Way

Wrong-site, wrong-patient and wrong-procedure surgery must be prevented at all costs. The 3 steps of the Joint Commission's Universal Protocol make ...

Home > News > January, 2012

Informed Consent and the Deaf Patient

Hospital cleared in deaf woman's epidural injury case.

Published: January 30, 2012
Categories: Anesthesia, Legal/Regulatory, News

An appeals court has dismissed a deaf patient's claim that a hospital's failure to provide an interpreter led to injuries she sustained from an epidural injection.

Amanda Crider, a deaf woman who relies on sign language interpreters, claims to have notified the staff upon her admission to Barnes-Jewish St. Peters (Missouri) Hospital that she desired to have a natural childbirth without an epidural or other pain medications. According to court records, Ms. Crider claims that she had refused consent to any such medications unless absolutely necessary.

An epidural was inserted into Ms. Crider's spine, however, after she gave what she maintained was her "uninformed consent" for the procedure. In the lawsuit she later filed, Ms. Crider alleged the injection caused persistent physical pain and disabling symptoms associated with epidural procedures, and claims that she was entitled to know about such risks before agreeing to the injection.

While the hospital reportedly encouraged Ms. Crider to have an epidural, Ms. Crider claims that the facility "could not and did not provide her with interpretation services to assist in explaining why they felt an epidural was necessary," court records indicate. As such, doctors and medical staff couldn't effectively explain to Ms. Crider the risks and benefits of the epidural, and couldn't understand her wishes and instruction regarding her care, according to the complaint. Subsequently, she "mistakenly believed that the epidural was medically necessary," according to court records.

Ms. Crider sought to recover damages for her injuries. A trial court dismissed her complaint on the grounds that she didn't file the appropriate healthcare affidavit required when a plaintiff claims the defendant failed to appropriately obtain informed consent. According to court records, Ms. Crider asserted that she wasn't obliged to file an affidavit, because she wasn't alleging the hospital "improperly rendered or failed to render healthcare services." The appeals court decision upheld the trial court's judgment.

Attorneys for Ms. Crider could not be reached for comment, and representatives for Barnes-Jewish St. Peters Hospital declined to comment on the case.

Mark McGraw

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.


Also in the News...

Elderly Woman Severely Injured in Fall Off OR Table

ASC Administrator Stabbed to Death by Estranged Husband

Patient Dies After Admission for Gallbladder Surgery That Wasn't Performed

Orthopod Owes $150,000 for Post-Op Knee Infection

Ophthalmologist Sues His Own ASC for Blocking Plans to Open Competing Center

So-What Study Finds That ASC Owners Perform More Surgery

CMS Updates Emergency Equipment Requirement

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
PRODUCT & SERVICE RESOURCES
Did You See This?
A showcase of products and services geared to make your facility better.

Architects' Showcase
Is a beautiful, efficient new facility in your future?
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120430_KenQuest_AR-300x250.gif
Other Articles That May Interest You
Malpractice Case Pits Informed Consent Vs. Expert Testimony
Surgeon failed to outline risks, but patient didn't have solid proof of injury.
Study: Men at Greater Risk of Cartilage Damage After ACL Surgery
Surprising results point to need for timely reconstructive surgery after knee injury, experts say.
Medicare Issues ASC Quality Reporting Program Codes
Facilities can begin reporting measures next week.