Subscriptions

Advertising

Resources

About Us

Contact Us

Create An Account Forgot Your Password?
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month E-Weekly Newsletter Building a Facility Article Archive Second Opinions
Search:
Benchmarking
General Surgery
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Building/Renovating
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120201_Provation_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120322_Soma_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20110124_ImageFirst_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20111003_Ansell_LB-154x100.gif
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

Malpractice Verdicts Often Favor Physicians

Physicians come out on the winning end of 80% of malpractice claims that end in jury verdicts, according to researchers at Massachusetts General Hos...

Study: CT Colongraphy Effective in Finding Polyps

A CT-scan-based, laxative-free "virtual colonoscopy" may be as effective as standard colonoscopy in finding potentially cancerous polyps, according ...

Wrong-Site Prevention Video Shows the Right Way

Wrong-site, wrong-patient and wrong-procedure surgery must be prevented at all costs. The 3 steps of the Joint Commission's Universal Protocol make ...

Home > News > January, 2012

The Case of the Mismarked Nipples

Breast reduction patient sues surgeon for placing her nipples too high.

Published: January 12, 2012
Categories: Legal/Regulatory, Malpractice, Cosmetic Surgery, News

After a Georgia woman received breast reduction surgery, she found to her great surprise that her nipples were up near her collarbones. When she complained, her surgeon said he didn't see a problem. She sued him and was awarded $170,000. A free repair would have cost him around $13,000. Richard C. Mitchell, the patient's attorney, says there are 2 lessons here: "Measure twice, cut once," and when you make a mistake, own up to it.

The day before performing breast reduction surgery on Elizabeth Waite, Atlanta plastic surgeon Sheldon M. Lincenberg, MD, drew the markings on her breasts showing where the nipples would be after surgery. Although there was a lot of breast to cut away, Ms. Waite and her husband wondered whether the markings were put too high, Mr. Mitchell says. The photos Mr. Waite took of the markings the night before surgery were later evidence in Dr. Lincenberg's malpractice trial.

When Ms. Waite saw the results immediately after surgery, her nipples seemed even higher than the markings had been. "They were almost up to her clavicle," says Mr. Mitchell. Ms. Waite complained right away, but Dr. Lincenberg downplayed the problem, the attorney says.

Back home, Ms. Waite found she could not put on a bra, wear many of her clothes or nurse her baby. She continued to ask Dr. Lincenberg to fix the problem. "The last time she saw him, he said there are probably things we can try," Mr. Mitchell says. "But by that time she didn't want him to touch her." She sued Dr. Lincenberg.

Mr. Mitchell says his client could not afford to pay for followup surgery with another surgeon. While her health insurance had paid for the breast reduction, it would not cover another procedure. "Her insurer did not consider this repair medically necessary," the attorney says. "Of course, it was medically necessary, but that's how insurers are these days."

Dr. Lincenberg continued to insist there was no problem and refused to settle. His explanation at the trial was that post-operative changes had caused Ms. Waite's breasts to drop, giving the appearance that her nipples were too high. "I guess he really thought he was going to win," Mr. Mitchell says. "But the pictures [shown at the trial] were horrible," the attorney says. The jurors saw for themselves where the nipples had been placed.

All but the $13,000 cost for surgical repair was for pain and suffering. Dr. Lincenberg decided not to appeal and his malpractice carrier paid the $170,000 award. Wayne D. McGrew III, the attorney for Dr. Lincenberg, did not respond to a request for comment.

Leigh Page

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.


Also in the News...

Elderly Woman Severely Injured in Fall Off OR Table

ASC Administrator Stabbed to Death by Estranged Husband

Patient Dies After Admission for Gallbladder Surgery That Wasn't Performed

Orthopod Owes $150,000 for Post-Op Knee Infection

Ophthalmologist Sues His Own ASC for Blocking Plans to Open Competing Center

So-What Study Finds That ASC Owners Perform More Surgery

CMS Updates Emergency Equipment Requirement

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
PRODUCT & SERVICE RESOURCES
Did You See This?
A showcase of products and services geared to make your facility better.

Architects' Showcase
Is a beautiful, efficient new facility in your future?
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120509_ORX_AR-300x250.gif
Other Articles That May Interest You
ASCs Have 1 Month to Begin Using Safe Surgery Checklist
Medicare's safe surgery checklist requirement begins January 1, 2012.
Paper Clip Dentist Sentenced to Year in Jail
Michael Clair, DDS, subbed wire for stainless steel implants in root canals.
Colonoscopy Tops Flexible Sigmoidoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Detection
Head-to-head comparison touts colonoscopy screening as the "gold standard."