Subscriptions

Advertising

Resources

About Us

Contact Us

Create An Account Forgot Your Password?
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month E-Weekly Newsletter Building a Facility Article Archive Second Opinions
Search:
Benchmarking
General Surgery
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Building/Renovating
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120430_ISI_LB-154x100.jpg
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120426_PDI_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120322_Soma_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120126_APIC_LB-154x100.jpg
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

Malpractice Verdicts Often Favor Physicians

Physicians come out on the winning end of 80% of malpractice claims that end in jury verdicts, according to researchers at Massachusetts General Hos...

Study: CT Colongraphy Effective in Finding Polyps

A CT-scan-based, laxative-free "virtual colonoscopy" may be as effective as standard colonoscopy in finding potentially cancerous polyps, according ...

Wrong-Site Prevention Video Shows the Right Way

Wrong-site, wrong-patient and wrong-procedure surgery must be prevented at all costs. The 3 steps of the Joint Commission's Universal Protocol make ...

Home > News > June, 2011

Senators Question Regulatory Oversight of Physician-Owned Medical Device Distributorships

Do surgeons who own shares of implant distributors have an unchecked conflict of interest?

Published: June 10, 2011
Categories: Legal/Regulatory, Orthopedics, Spine/Neurosurgery, Supplies/Implants, News

Surgeons who own shares in so-called physician-owned distributorships (PODs) could soon find themselves under tighter regulatory scrutiny. The arrangements, in which physicians-investors own shares in a third-party entity that distributes the medical devices they use, "raise a number of troubling issues" that regulatory bodies have yet to address, warns a bipartisan group of U.S. senators who've asked the Department of Health and Human Services to further review PODs and their practices.

PODs started cropping up in California in 2003 but their numbers have grown rapidly over the past 2 years, giving them a "significant national presence," according to a report released by the Senate Finance Committee minority staff this month. For now, these distributorships primarily deal in orthopedic and spine implants, and the report questions whether there's a relationship between their proliferation and a reported rise in complex spinal fusion surgeries being performed on Medicare patients.

"The very nature of PODs seem to create financial incentives for physician investors to use those devices that give them the greatest financial return and that, in the process, patient treatment decisions may be based on personal financial gain," write Republican Finance Committee staffers, led by Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah.

In response to the findings, Sen. Hatch and 4 other members of the Senate Finance Committee sent letters to HHS Inspector General Daniel Levinson and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Donald Berwick, MD, this week asking them to investigate the potential conflict of interest, patient safety and cost containment issues associated with PODs.

The senators do not condemn PODs outright and note that some of these entities appear to have safeguards in place to prevent abuse. But they express concern that existing guidance may not be enough to prevent potential abuses and that "guidance alone, in the absence of any visible enforcement proceedings, may be insufficient to stop the growth of those entities that do not appear to be structured with the appropriate safeguards."

The senators have asked the OIG to conduct an inquiry into PODs, report their findings by Aug. 12, 2011, and recommend what, if any, "further action should be taken by the OIG and Congress to effectively address the patient and program risks presented by PODs."

Meanwhile, they ask CMS to include PODs in their considerations as they finalize reporting requirements for the Physician Payments Sunshine Act and implementation of accountable care organizations. "The final rule" for ACOs "should prohibit ACOs from purchasing products or services from entities that are owned by physicians participating in the ACO," write the senators, who seek a response from CMS by July 15.

Irene Tsikitas

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.


Also in the News...

Elderly Woman Severely Injured in Fall Off OR Table

ASC Administrator Stabbed to Death by Estranged Husband

Patient Dies After Admission for Gallbladder Surgery That Wasn't Performed

Orthopod Owes $150,000 for Post-Op Knee Infection

Ophthalmologist Sues His Own ASC for Blocking Plans to Open Competing Center

So-What Study Finds That ASC Owners Perform More Surgery

CMS Updates Emergency Equipment Requirement

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
PRODUCT & SERVICE RESOURCES
Did You See This?
A showcase of products and services geared to make your facility better.

Architects' Showcase
Is a beautiful, efficient new facility in your future?
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120429_KenQuest_AR-300x250.gif
Other Articles That May Interest You
Nurse Fired to Appease Anesthesiologist
Court: ASC was within rights to dump nurse and hire doctor.
Patients Still Delaying Medical Care Despite Economic Recovery
High gas prices, "recessionary mind-set" keeping patients from bouncing back to the doctor's office.
FDA Issues Extension for Steris System 1 Users
Company will support sterile processing system until August 2, 2012.