/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20111124_Arthrex_TB-378x82.jpg

Subscriptions

Advertising

Resources

About Us

Contact Us

Create An Account Forgot Your Password?
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month E-Weekly Newsletter Building a Facility Article Archive Second Opinions
Search:
Benchmarking
General Surgery
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Building/Renovating
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120322_Soma_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120430_ISI_LB-154x100.jpg
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120126_APIC_LB-154x100.jpg
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120426_PDI_LB-154x100.gif
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

Malpractice Verdicts Often Favor Physicians

Physicians come out on the winning end of 80% of malpractice claims that end in jury verdicts, according to researchers at Massachusetts General Hos...

Study: CT Colongraphy Effective in Finding Polyps

A CT-scan-based, laxative-free "virtual colonoscopy" may be as effective as standard colonoscopy in finding potentially cancerous polyps, according ...

Wrong-Site Prevention Video Shows the Right Way

Wrong-site, wrong-patient and wrong-procedure surgery must be prevented at all costs. The 3 steps of the Joint Commission's Universal Protocol make ...

Home > News > April, 2011

Contaminated Viscoelastic Lawsuit Returned to Trial Court

Appeals court orders reconsideration of venue for cataract patients.

Published: April 11, 2011
Categories: Infection Control, Ophthalmology, Safety, News

Eight cataract patients who claim that contaminated viscoelastic caused their post-op injuries may be able to sue the manufacturer in Los Angeles, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The elderly patients, all residents of the city of Monterrey, Mexico, underwent cataract procedures between Oct. 11 and Oct. 16, 2007, at the hands of an ophthalmic surgeon with 25 years' experience in the specialty.

Hours after the surgeries, each contracted bacterial endophthalmitis. In 3 of the cases, patients required removal of the operative eye. The other 5 lost sight in the eye. Each patient had been treated with Advanced Medical Optics' Healon viscoelastic product. According to court records, the product shipped to the surgeon was later determined to be contaminated.

Through their attorneys, the 8 patients sued AMO in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles, the region where the company (now known as Abbott Medical Optics) is located. The district court dismissed the case at AMO's request that a case involving surgery performed in Mexico would be more suitably heard in a Mexican court.

The patients appealed their case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco while at the same time filing suit in a Mexican court. The Mexican court declined jurisdiction over the case, since the nation's laws doesn't give it authority over a company that isn't incorporated there.

This new development led the federal appeals court to order the trial court to reconsider its earlier dismissal in light of the Mexican court's action. The trial court's decision may have been correct at the time, the appeals court judges wrote in their April 7 ruling. However, "when intervening developments in a foreign jurisdiction ... could leave plaintiffs without an available forum in which to bring their claims, it is appropriate to remand the matter back to the district court so it can reconsider its decision based upon updated information."

"We look forward to moving the case forward," said the patients' attorney, Edward C. Snyder of Castillo Snyder in San Antonio, Texas, "and getting some justice for the patients, each of whom lost sight in an eye."

An attorney for AMO did not immediately return a request for comment.

David Bernard

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.


Also in the News...

Elderly Woman Severely Injured in Fall Off OR Table

ASC Administrator Stabbed to Death by Estranged Husband

Patient Dies After Admission for Gallbladder Surgery That Wasn't Performed

Orthopod Owes $150,000 for Post-Op Knee Infection

Ophthalmologist Sues His Own ASC for Blocking Plans to Open Competing Center

So-What Study Finds That ASC Owners Perform More Surgery

CMS Updates Emergency Equipment Requirement

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
PRODUCT & SERVICE RESOURCES
Did You See This?
A showcase of products and services geared to make your facility better.

Architects' Showcase
Is a beautiful, efficient new facility in your future?
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120323_ORX_AR-300x250.jpg
Other Articles That May Interest You
San Francisco ASC Home to First Meniscus Transplant Center
Controversial procedure to delay, avoid total knee replacement available as outpatient surgery.
Are You Prepared for Malignant Hyperthermia?
Experts urge evaluation of resources, coordination of transfer strategies.
First Malpractice Trial Over Contaminated VA Endoscopes Begins
Did "dirty scope" infect Air Force vet with hepatitis C?