/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20111124_Arthrex_TB-378x82.jpg

Subscriptions

Advertising

Resources

About Us

Contact Us

Create An Account Forgot Your Password?
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month E-Weekly Newsletter Building a Facility Article Archive Second Opinions
Search:
Benchmarking
General Surgery
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Building/Renovating
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120322_Soma_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120430_ISI_LB-154x100.jpg
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120126_APIC_LB-154x100.jpg
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120426_PDI_LB-154x100.gif
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

Malpractice Verdicts Often Favor Physicians

Physicians come out on the winning end of 80% of malpractice claims that end in jury verdicts, according to researchers at Massachusetts General Hos...

Study: CT Colongraphy Effective in Finding Polyps

A CT-scan-based, laxative-free "virtual colonoscopy" may be as effective as standard colonoscopy in finding potentially cancerous polyps, according ...

Wrong-Site Prevention Video Shows the Right Way

Wrong-site, wrong-patient and wrong-procedure surgery must be prevented at all costs. The 3 steps of the Joint Commission's Universal Protocol make ...

Home > News > February, 2011

ASCs Sue Insurers for Denying Manipulation Under Anesthesia Claims

2 Florida facilities that performed chiropractic procedure are seeking "many hundreds of thousands of dollars."

Published: February 8, 2011
Categories: Anesthesia, Code/Bill/Reimburse, Legal/Regulatory, News

Manipulation under anesthesia, the controversial and lucrative chiropractic procedure that involves lightly anesthetizing patients so that you can twist, bend and adjust them in an effort to improve or even restore range of motion, is at the center of a lawsuit pitting 2 Florida surgery centers against 4 of the country's leading insurers.

In one corner, you have Sanctuary Surgical Centre in Boca Raton and Gladiolus Surgery Center in Fort Myers claiming that payors first reduced and later denied their out-of-network claims for manipulation under anesthesia, otherwise known as MUA, despite giving the ASCs pre-authorizations and pre-certification for individual patients' MUA procedures. The ASCs are hoping to collect "many hundreds of thousands of dollars," says Stephen Lampf of Lampf, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow in West Orange, N.J.

In the other corner, you have Aetna, United Healthcare, Cigna and Blue Cross, which ceased reimbursing the ASCs for MUA in late 2007 because, the suit claims, MUA is "experimental, investigatory, not medically necessary" or not "a covered benefit under the plan."

Performed by either an osteopath or an orthopedic surgeon with a chiropractor in the room assisting, MUA typically requires 3 consecutive days of treatment, each treatment lasting around 30 minutes. Reimbursement ranges from $25,000 to $60,000 per patient, says Mr. Lampf. The insurers reimbursed for the procedures when the ASCs began performing them in late 2006. Months later, however, the payors began discounting the MUA claims. Soon thereafter, they began systematically denying all MUA claims, says Mr. Lampf.

"Our position is that the insurance companies said one day, 'We're not paying for it.' They violated their own contracts," says Mr. Lampf. "We believe it was arbitrary, capricious and violates federal law."

Efforts to reach attorneys representing the payors were unsuccessful. Phone messages left with the ASCs were not returned.

Critics of MUA call it a lucrative and largely unnecessary procedure. Supporters say it's been practiced safely and successfully for years on patients who don't respond to more conventional treatment.

Incidentally, Gladiolus Surgery Center stopped accepting patients on a voluntary basis last year after state inspectors found problems that could be harmful to the health and safety of patients, according to state records. The center has since reopened.

Dan O'Connor

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.


Also in the News...

Elderly Woman Severely Injured in Fall Off OR Table

ASC Administrator Stabbed to Death by Estranged Husband

Patient Dies After Admission for Gallbladder Surgery That Wasn't Performed

Orthopod Owes $150,000 for Post-Op Knee Infection

Ophthalmologist Sues His Own ASC for Blocking Plans to Open Competing Center

So-What Study Finds That ASC Owners Perform More Surgery

CMS Updates Emergency Equipment Requirement

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
PRODUCT & SERVICE RESOURCES
Did You See This?
A showcase of products and services geared to make your facility better.

Architects' Showcase
Is a beautiful, efficient new facility in your future?
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120323_ORX_AR-300x250.jpg
Other Articles That May Interest You
Where PONV is Prevalent
The cases that see the most of the complication, and options for avoiding it.
Surgeons Sue Each Other After Partnership Blows Up
When podiatrist booted from ASC sues to get his original investment and share of profits, he allegedly defamed center's medical director.
Nurse Fired After Complaining of Patient Photos Posted on Facebook
Texas woman is suing her former employers for retaliation and discrimination.