Subscriptions

Advertising

Resources

About Us

Contact Us

Create An Account Forgot Your Password?
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month E-Weekly Newsletter Building a Facility Article Archive Second Opinions
Search:
Benchmarking
General Surgery
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Building/Renovating
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120430_ISI_LB-154x100.jpg
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120126_APIC_LB-154x100.jpg
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120426_PDI_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120322_Soma_LB-154x100.gif
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

Malpractice Verdicts Often Favor Physicians

Physicians come out on the winning end of 80% of malpractice claims that end in jury verdicts, according to researchers at Massachusetts General Hos...

Study: CT Colongraphy Effective in Finding Polyps

A CT-scan-based, laxative-free "virtual colonoscopy" may be as effective as standard colonoscopy in finding potentially cancerous polyps, according ...

Wrong-Site Prevention Video Shows the Right Way

Wrong-site, wrong-patient and wrong-procedure surgery must be prevented at all costs. The 3 steps of the Joint Commission's Universal Protocol make ...

Home > News > January, 2011

Clearing Up Confusion Over the Steris System 1E

Why biological indicators aren't necessary for this liquid chemical sterilization system.

Published: January 28, 2011
Categories: Infection Control, Product Reports, News

More than 8 months after the FDA cleared the Steris System 1E for processing "heat-sensitive semi-critical and critical devices," questions about the system, designed to replace the Steris System 1, and how it's to be used in practice still persist.

  • Have biological indicators for the SS1E been approved? No, says Rosemary Niewolak, Steris's director of low temperature sterilization, but that doesn't mean you can't use the SS1E. Steris is "still in discussion with the FDA on the clearance of" its biological indicator for the SS1E and "cannot provide any assurances to our customers that the FDA will clear the biological indicator," says Ms. Niewolak.

    However, the FDA cleared the SS1E for usage without a biological indicator back in April 2010, and in fact biological indicators are not included in the FDA guidance on liquid chemical sterilants. The FDA requires several other steps to validate the efficacy of such systems, including chemical indicators, but not biological indicators. (The FDA has cleared Steris's chemical indicators for the SS1E.)

    "Since a biological indicator is not required for our customers to be able to utilize the processor," says Ms. Niewolak, and because there are less than 7 months left for SS1 users to transition to an alternative system, Steris is recommending that customers "move forward with the transition" rather than wait for the FDA to approve the biological indicator.

    For a more detailed review of process monitoring and validation for the System 1E, check out Steris' live webcasts scheduled for 2 p.m. ET Monday, Jan. 31, and 10 a.m. ET Tuesday, Feb. 1.

  • Is the SS1E a sterilizer? In April 2010, the FDA cleared the Steris System 1E as a "liquid chemical sterilization system" intended for "liquid chemical sterilization of cleaned, immersible and reusable critical and semi-critical heat-sensitive medical devices."

    This language suggests the SS1E is, in fact, a sterilizer — right? However, the FDA's clearance letter also notes that devices processed in the SS1E are rinsed with potable water that, despite going through a 3-step treatment process that involves filtration and exposure to ultraviolet rays, is not sterile. Therefore, "devices processed using liquid chemical sterilization cannot be assured to be sterile" and should be used immediately.

    "There's a very fine line here, and it's caused a lot of confusion in the healthcare community," says Nancy Chobin, RN, AAS, ASCP, CSPDM, executive director of the Certification Board for Sterile Processing and Distribution. "The process is cleared as a sterilant, not as a sterilizer." She recommends that you go back to the FDA clearance letter, read the language carefully and don't just assume that whatever devices you used to process in the SS1 are OK to process via the SS1E. "Devices should not be processed in the 1E unless the device manufacturer has validated their product for use in the 1E."

    Irene Tsikitas

  • © Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.


    Also in the News...

    Elderly Woman Severely Injured in Fall Off OR Table

    ASC Administrator Stabbed to Death by Estranged Husband

    Patient Dies After Admission for Gallbladder Surgery That Wasn't Performed

    Orthopod Owes $150,000 for Post-Op Knee Infection

    Ophthalmologist Sues His Own ASC for Blocking Plans to Open Competing Center

    So-What Study Finds That ASC Owners Perform More Surgery

    CMS Updates Emergency Equipment Requirement

    © Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.

    Already have an account? Please sign in:
    Email Address:
    Password:
    PRODUCT & SERVICE RESOURCES
    Did You See This?
    A showcase of products and services geared to make your facility better.

    Architects' Showcase
    Is a beautiful, efficient new facility in your future?
    /_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120429_KenQuest_AR-300x250.gif
    Other Articles That May Interest You
    Patients Still Delaying Medical Care Despite Economic Recovery
    High gas prices, "recessionary mind-set" keeping patients from bouncing back to the doctor's office.
    Hospital Execs Concerned About Costs, Training Associated With EHRs
    More facilities are adopting the technology, but less than half believe it will be a net positive.
    Transporting Contaminated GI Scopes
    Readers weigh in on this infection prevention issue.