/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20111124_Arthrex_TB-378x82.jpg

Subscriptions

Advertising

Resources

About Us

Contact Us

Create An Account Forgot Your Password?
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month E-Weekly Newsletter Building a Facility Article Archive Second Opinions
Search:
Benchmarking
General Surgery
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Building/Renovating
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120126_ASP_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20110502_Provista_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120126_APIC_LB-154x100.jpg
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20111003_Ansell_LB-154x100.gif
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

Can Protein-Free Diets Reduce Surgical Complications?

Restricting proteins and amino acids from patients' diets in the days leading up to surgery may lower complication risks, say researchers at the Har...

Robotic Surgery Patients May Have Unrealistic Expectations

Men expecting quicker returns to physical activity after robotic prostate surgery may have unrealistic expectations for the procedure, according to ...

Making the Most of a Staffing Dollar

"Today more than ever, you need to be certain you're getting your money's worth for every minute your staff are on the clock," says Donna Ferguson, ...

Home > News > July, 2010

Stryker Biotech Denied More Details on Federal Fraud Charges

Criminal indictment accuses the company of fraudulently marketing 2 bone-healing products.

Published: July 29, 2010
Categories: Legal/Regulatory, Orthopedics, Product Reports, News

Stryker Biotech and 4 former and current executives charged with the illegal marketing and sale of bone-healing devices for purposes not approved by the FDA have been denied a request for more information on the federal government's case against them.

In its October 2009 indictment, a federal grand jury in the District of Massachusetts alleged that, from February 2006 to February 2008, Stryker Biotech, former company president Mark Philip and sales managers William Heppner, David Ard and Jeffrey Whitaker had marketed Calstrux, a bone void filler, as a product to be mixed with OP-1, a protein that aids bone growth, even though the FDA had not approved the mixture.

Following an FDA investigation into the company's alleged fraudulent marketing scheme, the Justice Department charged the company and the 4 individuals with 16 counts of wire fraud, conspiracy to defraud the United States and to distribute a misbranded medical device, and false statements made to the FDA.

Claiming that they needed more information to better prepare their defense, the defendants filed a joint motion for a bill of particulars explaining which paragraphs in the indictment referred to which individuals and more specifics about the allegations, such as precisely when and where the alleged fraudulent actions occurred. The U.S. attorneys agreed to clarify which paragraphs in the indictment that refer only to "Stryker Biotech" also relate to the conduct of individual defendants.

Following this agreement, a U.S. magistrate judge last week denied the defendants' motion for a bill of particulars, finding that "the indictment and subsequent discovery provided by the government adequately inform the defendants of the charges brought against them and provide sufficient information to allow the defendants to prepare an adequate defense."

At the time of the indictment, Stryker Corp. released a statement saying it was "disappointed with this action and still hopes to be able to reach a fair and just resolution of this matter." The company says it has no further comment on the allegations brought against its Biotech division.

The wire fraud charges alone carry penalties of up to 20 years of imprisonment and fines of at least $250,000 each for the 4 individuals named in the indictment, plus fines of at least $500,000 for Stryker Biotech.

Irene Tsikitas

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.


Also in the News...

Was This Orthopedic Surgeon Too Slow, or Just Conscientious?

Drunken Night Out Costs Pediatric RN His Job

Doctor Loses License for Touching Anesthetized Patients' Breasts

Automatic Meal-Break Deductions

Paper Clip Dentist Sentenced to Year in Jail

Gynecologists Offering Breast Augmentation and Ophthalmologists Doing Liposuction

Tragic Error: Remove Monitoring Equipment From Patient Given High Doses of Pain Meds

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
PRODUCT & SERVICE RESOURCES
Did You See This?
A showcase of products and services geared to make your facility better.

Architects' Showcase
Is a beautiful, efficient new facility in your future?
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120115_Olympus_AR-300x250.jpg
Other Articles That May Interest You
Liposuction May Have Legitimate Health Benefit
Study links procedure to reduced triglycerides, white blood cell counts.
Court: Stryker Still on the Hook for Pain Pump Liability
Denies manufacturer's request to dismiss injured patient's lawsuit.
Patients Sue New Orleans Hospital Over Endoscope Reprocessing Glitch
Tulane Medical Center admits scopes weren't properly sanitized, but says infection risks are remote.