Subscriptions

Advertising

Resources

About Us

Contact Us

Create An Account Forgot Your Password?
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month E-Weekly Newsletter Building a Facility Article Archive Second Opinions
Search:
Benchmarking
General Surgery
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Building/Renovating
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20111003_Ansell_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120123_PDI_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120126_APIC_LB-154x100.jpg
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20110124_ImageFirst_LB-154x100.gif
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

Contact Congress Over Drug Shortage Issues

A Kentucky congressman is urging surgical facilities to contact their members of Congress and request that they sign his letter demanding changes to...

N.J. Posts ASC Inspection Reports Online

State and federal inspection reports of New Jersey's ASCs are now available online, giving patients an opportunity to make more informed choices abo...

Are Opioids Necessary?

While it's not always practical, or even possible, to eliminate opioids from your post-op pain management regiment, reducing their use in favor of n...

Home > News > July, 2010

Surgical Product Supplier Filled Custom Packs With Cheaper, Unapproved Items

Maxxim Medical tried to fight off bankruptcy by deceiving hospital customers.

Published: July 16, 2010
Categories: Legal/Regulatory, Product Reports, News

In the last days of its financial decline, Maxxim Medical had a secret moneysaving policy of misleading its customers by substituting cheaper instruments that were not approved by the customer into custom procedure trays that it prepared for hospitals and surgical facilities. In company memos, the scheme used in 2002 and 2003 was called "Project Stanley," according to federal court documents.

The deception was revealed this spring in court documents in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Tampa, Fla., during a legal dispute over former Maxxim sales rep Karen McCauley's violation of a non-compete agreement that she signed with the now-defunct company.

As time went on during Project Stanley, hospital customers who ordered the custom trays through group purchasing organizations became aware of the inferior products and service from Maxxim, according to court documents. "We had a poor quality product coming in here on an on-going basis," Sandy Whitney, a materials manager at Penobscot Bay Medical Center in Rockport, Maine, testified in court documents.

As business became worse for Maxxim, which was based in Waltham, Mass., Ms. McCauley left the company in June 2003 and went to work for Professional Hospital Supply, based in Temecula, Calif. In March this year, a federal judge ruled that Ms. McCauley did violate the non-compete clause. However, the judge also said that Maxxim didn't suffer any damage from Ms. McCauley's job switch. In the end, the judge ruled for Ms. McCauley, saying that she was not responsible for any loss of business. "The loss of [business] by Maxxim was due to the poor quality of Maxxim's services and goods," wrote Judge Michael Williamson. Ms. McCauley did not respond to a request for comment for this article.

On July 8, Medline appealed the court decision. Maxxim went bankrupt in 2003 and Medline purchased Maxxim's surgical division at auction in October of that year. Since the purchase, Medline has been dealing with a handful of legal issues related to Maxxim and its bankruptcy. A spokesman for Medline said the company had no comment on the lawsuit or Project Stanley.

Besides having inferior, unapproved contents, the procedure trays were often delivered late. So many customers complained to the VHA purchasing group that the GPO did not renew Maxxim's contract. "There was an outcry from the membership about the quality of service that Maxxim was providing," said Ms. Whitney in court documents.

Kent Steinriede

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.


Also in the News...

Facelift Patient Devoted Herself to Ruining Surgeon's Reputation

A Simple Way to Screen for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

You Might Be an OR Nurse If ...

Was Sacked Surgeon Safety Conscious or Money Hungry?

6 Tips for a Stress-Free Accreditation Survey

Are You Ready for an MH Emergency?

Just How Useful (Really) Is Gowning and Gloving?

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
PRODUCT & SERVICE RESOURCES
Did You See This?
A showcase of products and services geared to make your facility better.

Architects' Showcase
Is a beautiful, efficient new facility in your future?
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120115_Olympus_AR-300x250.jpg
Other Articles That May Interest You
Should You Be Wary of EMRs?
Institute of Medicine report cites poorly designed electronic medical records for some errors.
Obtaining Informed Consent: Just Keep It Simple?
Study suggests reinforcement methods beyond a paper handout don't have much impact.
Enlist Your Patients in the Fight Against Healthcare-Associated Infections
Download free, customizable educational materials from APIC.