Subscriptions

Advertising

Resources

About Us

Contact Us

Create An Account Forgot Your Password?
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month E-Weekly Newsletter Building a Facility Article Archive Second Opinions
Search:
Benchmarking
General Surgery
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Building/Renovating
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20110124_ImageFirst_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120126_ASP_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20111003_Ansell_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20110502_Provista_LB-154x100.gif
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

Contact Congress Over Drug Shortage Issues

A Kentucky congressman is urging surgical facilities to contact their members of Congress and request that they sign his letter demanding changes to...

N.J. Posts ASC Inspection Reports Online

State and federal inspection reports of New Jersey's ASCs are now available online, giving patients an opportunity to make more informed choices abo...

Are Opioids Necessary?

While it's not always practical, or even possible, to eliminate opioids from your post-op pain management regiment, reducing their use in favor of n...

Home > News > April, 2010

Instrument Turnaround: Should it Slow Down?

A Nashville jury will decide whether a hospital should quarantine sterilized instruments.

Published: April 9, 2010
Categories: Malpractice, News

Should surgical facilities wait 48 hours after sterilization before putting surgical instruments back into service so that biological indicators can be evaluated? That's the question before a Tennessee trial court, after a ruling last month in the Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

In 2002, Vanderbilt Hospital used reprocessor Steriltek, now a subsidiary of Steris, to decontaminate and sterilize orthopedic instruments at an offsite facility. A contract called for Steriltek to return the instruments to the facility within 8 hours of picking them up.

Steriltek used the Sterrad process to sterilize instruments and used chemical and biological monitors to evaluate efficacy. Two days after processing a load, Steriltek employee Kevin Allen, RN, learned that the biologic indicator on some of the instruments in the load tested positive. When he notified the hospital, some of the instruments were already in use in an osteotomy case that included a planned arthroplasty. The surgeon immediately aborted the case, deciding to wait to implant the prosthetic femur and knee. He used a cement spacer until he could complete the operation 2 months later.

Following the second operation, the patient, Jessica Jovan Turner, died and her mother, Sandra Yevette Turner, sued, charging that Steriltek failed "to warn, prior to the surgical procedure, that the equipment and/or instrumentation was contaminated, unsterile and unsafe to use," and that the hospital "negligently failed to have in place a system of proper surgical protocols, procedures and measures to assure that surgical instrumentation was clean, sterile and in a safe condition suitable prior to its actual use during the course of surgery."

Trial judges in Tennessee Circuit Court for Davidson County dismissed Steriltek from the case because Mr. Allen testified that the indicator test was a false positive — the instruments were in fact sterile — and because the court decided that Steriltek was not responsible for warning the hospital that biologic tests take 48 hours. The hospital knew that already, said the trial court. The Tennessee appeals court upheld that part of the decision. But in a second appeal, the court overturned the trial court's decision to dismiss the hospital from the case.

Vanderbilt's assistant administrative director of surgical support services Michael J. Hughes RN, BSN, MA, CNOR, testified that hospital policy gave employees the green light to use Sterrad-sterilized instruments immediately after completion of the sterilization process. Appellate court justices wrote that the plaintiff's claim that "the hospital should have implemented a policy or procedure to quarantine equipment and instruments for 48 hours after sterilization" was not obviously wrong and deserved consideration by a jury. An attorney for Vanderbilt said that she was not able to comment on the case, because the litigation is ongoing.

Outpatient Surgery Magazine Staff

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.


Also in the News...

6 Tips for a Stress-Free Accreditation Survey

Are You Ready for an MH Emergency?

Just How Useful (Really) Is Gowning and Gloving?

Despite Huge Return on Their Investment, 3 Retinal Surgeons Squeezed Out of ASC Sue

14 Hospitals Pay $12M to Settle Medicare Fraud Charges Surrounding Spinal Surgery Billing

Could Your Facility Use a Spark?

Did Hospital Settle Malpractice Case to Spite Its Chief of Surgery?

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
PRODUCT & SERVICE RESOURCES
Did You See This?
A showcase of products and services geared to make your facility better.

Architects' Showcase
Is a beautiful, efficient new facility in your future?
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120115_Olympus_AR-300x250.jpg
Other Articles That May Interest You
Watch This: Surgeon Builds Tiny Paper Plane With Da Vinci Robot
Seattle hospital posts video to demonstrate benefits of robotic surgery.
Study Finds End-Of-Life Surgery Common
Researchers raise debate over surgical intervention vs. discretion.
OSHA Agents Citing More ASCs for Bloodborne Pathogen Violations
Report says surgery centers lag behind hospitals in bloodborne pathogen standard compliance.