/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20110321_NDSSI_TB-378x82.gif

Subscriptions

Advertising

Resources

About Us

Contact Us

Create An Account Forgot Your Password?
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month E-Weekly Newsletter Building a Facility Article Archive Second Opinions
Search:
Benchmarking
General Surgery
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Building/Renovating
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120322_Soma_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120426_PDI_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120126_APIC_LB-154x100.jpg
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120430_ISI_LB-154x100.jpg
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

Malpractice Verdicts Often Favor Physicians

Physicians come out on the winning end of 80% of malpractice claims that end in jury verdicts, according to researchers at Massachusetts General Hos...

Study: CT Colongraphy Effective in Finding Polyps

A CT-scan-based, laxative-free "virtual colonoscopy" may be as effective as standard colonoscopy in finding potentially cancerous polyps, according ...

Wrong-Site Prevention Video Shows the Right Way

Wrong-site, wrong-patient and wrong-procedure surgery must be prevented at all costs. The 3 steps of the Joint Commission's Universal Protocol make ...

Home > News > April, 2010

What Does Informed Consent Cover, and Not Cover?

N.Y. court says not all scars are the same in cosmetic surgery.

Published: April 23, 2010
Categories: Legal/Regulatory, News, Patient Management

When a cosmetic surgery patient signs an informed consent form that says there may be scarring after surgery, it doesn't necessarily protect the physician from negligence for any scars that a patient develops, according to a New York Supreme Court ruling issued last month.

In an opinion released on April 13, a panel of judges on the Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department, sent a lawsuit between Natalie Wilson-Toby and Staten Island cosmetic surgeons Sheila Carol Bushkin, MD, and Robert Cattani, MD, back to trial in state court in King's County.

Citing previous New York decisions, the court wrote that unless consent forms are extremely specific, they do not establish, as a matter of law, that the scar a patient actually develops is consistent with the type of scar that the patient had been told was a possible risk of the procedure. In Ms. Wilson-Toby's case, the consent form and the surgeons' discussions with her did not sufficiently warn Ms. Wilson-Toby of the risks, according to the decision.

The decision stems from a medical malpractice lawsuit filed in 2004 against the surgeons and the Pavillion for Cosmetic Surgery in Staten Island for undisclosed damages. Drs. Buskin and Cattani performed cosmetic breast surgery on Ms. Wilson-Toby in April 2003. Afterwards, Ms. Wilson-Toby developed "significant scarring and has been caused to suffer severe physical injuries, pain and mental anguish," according to court documents. If she had known of the risks, she wouldn't have agreed to the surgery, says her complaint.

The surgeons had asked that the lawsuit be dismissed because Ms. Wilson-Toby had signed an informed consent form. In court documents, the surgeons said that Ms. Wilson-Toby was aware of the risks because she read and signed the form. But 2 appellate courts denied their request to have the case thrown out. "The consent forms advised the plaintiff generally that the surgery would result in permanent scars without giving any specific description of the location, nature, extent, or appearance of the scars," wrote the appellate judges for the higher court.

An attorney representing Ms. Wilson-Toby declined to comment on the case because it's pending litigation. An attorney for the surgeons did not return a request for comment. A trail date has yet to be announced.

Kent Steinriede .

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.


Also in the News...

Elderly Woman Severely Injured in Fall Off OR Table

ASC Administrator Stabbed to Death by Estranged Husband

Patient Dies After Admission for Gallbladder Surgery That Wasn't Performed

Orthopod Owes $150,000 for Post-Op Knee Infection

Ophthalmologist Sues His Own ASC for Blocking Plans to Open Competing Center

So-What Study Finds That ASC Owners Perform More Surgery

CMS Updates Emergency Equipment Requirement

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
PRODUCT & SERVICE RESOURCES
Did You See This?
A showcase of products and services geared to make your facility better.

Architects' Showcase
Is a beautiful, efficient new facility in your future?
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120508_ORX_AR-300x250.gif
Other Articles That May Interest You
$436.70 Less for Lithotripsy
Medicare correction results in 21% less for CPT 50590.
CMS Expected to Push Back October 2013 ICD-10 Deadline
You'll have more time to implement the new medical coding set.
Illinois Man Sues Spine Surgeon and Hospital After He Goes Blind
Obese, diabetic patient claims he lost sight because of 4-hour spine surgery.