Subscriptions

Advertising

Resources

About Us

Contact Us

Create An Account Forgot Your Password?
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month E-Weekly Newsletter Building a Facility Article Archive Second Opinions
Search:
Benchmarking
General Surgery
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Building/Renovating
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120126_ASP_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20110124_ImageFirst_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20111003_Ansell_LB-154x100.gif
/_media/adv/web/images/2011/20111202_Arthrex_LB-154x100.jpg
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

Contact Congress Over Drug Shortage Issues

A Kentucky congressman is urging surgical facilities to contact their members of Congress and request that they sign his letter demanding changes to...

N.J. Posts ASC Inspection Reports Online

State and federal inspection reports of New Jersey's ASCs are now available online, giving patients an opportunity to make more informed choices abo...

Are Opioids Necessary?

While it's not always practical, or even possible, to eliminate opioids from your post-op pain management regiment, reducing their use in favor of n...

Home > News > April, 2009

Different Anesthesia Models, Same Results

Study shows no difference in OB anesthesia complications at anesthesiologist-only and CRNA-only hospitals.

Published: April 3, 2009
Categories: Anesthesia, News

A recent study comparing different anesthesia provider models for obstetrical patients finds no statistical difference in the outcomes of cases at hospitals that use CRNAs vs. those that only use anesthesiologists.

Researchers examined data on more than 1.4 million OB patients from 369 hospitals in six states and found that the rate of complications from anesthesia in OB cases were roughly the same in anesthesiologist-only facilities (0.27 percent) and CRNA-only facilities (0.23 percent). Hospitals with other anesthesia models had OB anesthesia complication rates that varied between 0.24 percent and 0.37 percent, "with none statistically different from the anesthesiologist-only hospitals," the study shows.

The study, conducted by Jack Needleman, PhD, MS, of the UCLA School of Public Health, and Ann Minnick, PhD, RN, FAAN, of the Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, appears in the April 2009 issue of Health Services Research.

Irene Tsikitas

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.


Also in the News...

6 Tips for a Stress-Free Accreditation Survey

Are You Ready for an MH Emergency?

Just How Useful (Really) Is Gowning and Gloving?

Despite Huge Return on Their Investment, 3 Retinal Surgeons Squeezed Out of ASC Sue

14 Hospitals Pay $12M to Settle Medicare Fraud Charges Surrounding Spinal Surgery Billing

Could Your Facility Use a Spark?

Did Hospital Settle Malpractice Case to Spite Its Chief of Surgery?

© Copyright Herrin Publishing Partners LP 2011. REPRODUCTION OF THIS COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. We encourage LINKING to this content; view our linking policy here.

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
PRODUCT & SERVICE RESOURCES
Did You See This?
A showcase of products and services geared to make your facility better.

Architects' Showcase
Is a beautiful, efficient new facility in your future?
/_media/adv/web/images/2012/20120115_Olympus_AR-300x250.jpg
Other Articles That May Interest You
Obtaining Informed Consent: Just Keep It Simple?
Study suggests reinforcement methods beyond a paper handout don't have much impact.
Do Sports Orthopods Rely Too Heavily on MRIs?
Leading specialists say magnetic resonance imaging can be misleading.
Who Was to Blame for the Botched Malpractice Settlement?
Implosion of last-minute $150K deal opens door to $1M verdict.