advertiser banner advertiser banner advertiser banner
Digital Issues

Archive >  May, 2005 VI, No. 5

Safer, Simpler Hysterectomy

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy is less invasive and removes less tissue than procedures that remove the entire uterus.

Thomas Lyons

Years ago, women with abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids or other severe gynecological conditions had only one treatment choice: hysterectomy. Now there are many more surgical options that can preserve the uterus, such as endometrial ablation to control abnormal bleeding, or myomectomy or embolization to manage fibroids. But there's still a place for hysterectomy for certain patients, particularly women for whom other treatments have failed.

Nearly 70 percent of the 600,000 hysterectomies performed each year are total abdominal hysterectomies, in which the uterus and the cervix are removed through an abdominal incision. Vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy (see "Types of Hysterectomy" on page 32) are all less invasive procedures, but they still involve removing the entire uterus. But now, we have the technology to make hysterectomy a safer, less complex, outpatient procedure by removing the uterus laparoscopically and leaving the cervix intact. This procedure, which I began performing in 1990, is called laparoscopic supracervical (also known as subtotal or partial) hysterectomy, or LSH.

Have an account? Please log in:
Email Address:
  Remember my login on this computer


Do Safer, Better Glaucoma Surgery With This Kit

advertiser banner

Other Articles That May Interest You

Could JAMA Study Lead to Power Morcellation Ban?

Are Morcellators Safe for Hysterectomies?

They speed the procedure, but do they spread cancer, too? See what this gynecologic surgeon has to say.

Are Morcellation Fears Overblown?