Regional Anesthesia: Lessons from Iraq
Two years ago, a rocket-propelled grenade struck Army Sgt. Brian Wilhelm's lower left leg, fracturing his tibia and fibula, destroying the tibial nerve, and ravaging his vasculature and soft tissue. Prior to that day, the injury would have been a recipe for weeks of intense, prolonged agonizing pain only partly relieved by morphine and—following amputation—the potential for “phantom” limb pain.

But though this 19-year-old soldier was unlucky on the battlefield, his luck improved in the hospital; the day Brian was injured was also the first day of the Army's new Regional Anesthesia & Pain Management Initiative. Within 15 minutes of arrival, Brian had received lumbar plexus and sciatic blocks. His VAS score dropped from 10 to zero. Shortly after his first procedure, for which he was awake, he was chatting with buddies. Over the next 16 days, which included long flights and four more procedures, the catheters remained and his VAS scores stayed under 2. Today, as an amputee, he experiences no phantom pain or chronic regional pain syndrome.

Although such injuries hopefully will never become commonplace here, Brian's story and others dramatically illustrate the power of regional anesthesia. Here in the military, we're convinced that RA is far superior to traditional morphine-centered treatment for acute pain and for surgical anesthesia.

Since we treated Brian in 2003, we have treated more than 287 limb injuries with RA, including 285 single-injection blocks and 361 continuous catheters. We do this as a part of a multimodal program that includes NSAIDs, narcotic analgesics, benzodiazepines and gabapentin, but the blocks are the key. The mean VAS score of our patients who received indwelling continuous catheters (n=126) dropped from 3.7 (range 0-8) before catheter placement to 2.2 (range 0-6) daily for the first week or until the next operation, whichever came first.

Though our catheters stayed in place for as long as 17 days, we observed only seven superficial catheter site infections, all which cleared after we removed and replaced the catheters. Other complications included two self-limiting arterial punctures, 10 failed blocks, one tachycardia upon test dose (with uneventful second test dose), one sympathectomy, and eight failed placements or needle occlusions. We removed 37 catheters prematurely, usually on patient request; 15 of these patients had adequate analgesia without the blocks. We've seen no anesthetic toxicity, and virtually no opioid-induced over-sedation, nausea/vomiting, or respiratory depression.

By their nature, war injuries challenge us to push the pain-control envelope, and we have learned by doing so. As Sgt. Wilhelm's case suggests, we have found that RA can help prevent the “wind-up pain” that's so devastating to acute-pain patients. Ultimately, we hope to show that pre-empting pain and keeping the stress response and inflammatory mediators in check will reduce long-term morbidity and mortality and improve our patients' overall long-term recovery.

Read Next Part >   

Brought to you as an educational service by
Newest Articles
Yes You Can Get Reimbursed for Nerve Blocks
Part 43
Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Wise Investment
Part 42
Article Listing
Part 41: A Surgeon's View: Dispelling Some Common PNB Myths
Part 40: A Surgeon's Perspective: The Power of PNBs
Part 39: Acute Pain Nurse: Key to Continuous Infusion Success
Part 38: A Breakthrough in Nerve Stimulation
Part 37: No Pain, Big Gain
Part 36: Our Insurers Pay for Peripheral Nerve Blocks
Part 35: Fortifying Our Future With PNB Training
Part 34: Stimulating Catheters for Outpatient Surgery
Part 33: When Should We Use Stimulating Catheters?
Part 32: What Is Ultrasound's Role in Peripheral Nerve Blocks?
Part 31: There's No Better Advertisement than a Happy Patient!
Part 30: Avoiding Post-Lithotripsy Pain
Part 29: Regional Anesthesia Took My Pain From 10 to 0
Part 28: How to Make Peripheral Nerve Blocks Even Safer
Part 27: Helping Patients Understand Regional Blocks
Part 26: Ultrasound and Nerve Stimulation: Perfect Together
Part 25: The Post-Opioid Era
Part 24: Practical Pain Control
Part 23: In Our PACU, Blocks Made Miles of Difference
Part 22: Filling the Analgesic Gap
Part 21: Is Regional Anesthesia More Cost-Efficient?
Part 20: Prime Patients Early for PNB Success
Part 19: With Nerve Blocks, Time is Safety
Part 18: Nerve Blocks Improve Patient Well-Being
Part 17: The PNBs Have It
Part 16: Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: The Jury Is In
Part 15: Is Regional Anesthesia More Cost-Efficient?
Part 14: Block On!
Part 13: Regional Anesthesia: Lessons from Iraq
Part 12: Help is On the Way
Part 11: The Promise of Pediatric Peripheral Nerve Blocks
Part 10: Building a Better Regional Anesthesia Procedure Note
Part 9: Perception is Everything
Part 8: Peripheral Nerve Stimulators Improve Patient Comfort
Part 7: Regional Anesthesia Helps Elderly Patients Stay Alert and On Track
Part 6: 4 Ways to Make Continuous Infusions Run More Smoothly
Part 5: Tips for Managing Orthopedic Regional Anesthesia Patients
Part 4: How to Bill for Regional Anesthesia
Part 3: How to Ease Into Regional Blocks
Part 2: 3 Things to Know About Regional Anesthesia Programs
Part 1: The Case for Regional Anesthesia