4 Ways to Make Continuous Infusions Run More Smoothly
Five years ago, patients undergoing open rotator cuff and complex ACL repairs required such a high narcotic load that they frequently had to stay overnight in the hospital. Patients undergoing frozen shoulder surgery suffered narcotic “fog” and serious pain during rehab. Today, thanks to continuous-infusion regional blocks that control pain at its source for 72 hours or longer, the surgical stay is shorter and the overall experience is more satisfying, more successful, and more economical for many of these patients. Here are four important lessons we've learned for ensuring the best care possible.

Screen patients. Patients who receive continuous-infusion blocks must understand the procedure, the post-op management requirements and the fact that this technique is an adjunct to other analgesic modalities (including cold therapy, NSAIDs and oral narcotics), because the extremity will be slightly anesthetized but not insensate. We discuss issues such as pump function, degree of motor block and analgesia over the phone, so language barriers are a relative contraindication, and lack of a working phone an absolute one.

Look ahead. Every day, I review the next day's surgical schedule and determine which patients will need a continuous-infusion catheter. We call these patients in 30 minutes early, because catheters are more complex and take longer to place than single-shot needles, and require more up-front education.

Although perfect predictions are nearly impossible, we can predetermine the approach for about 85 percent of all patients based on factors like age, procedure and surgeon. For example, a 50-year-old undergoing open rotator cuff repair is likely to need a continuous interscalene block for the first 48 to 72 post-op hours. A 70-year-old undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is likely to do well with a single-injection interscalene block.

We try to schedule patients who require intensive physical therapy early in the working week. This guarantees availability of PT during the infusion period, when patients have the best analgesia.

Educate wisely. As we've taught patients about our regional techniques, we've learned which “talking points” are most important. For instance, patients with continuous-infusion lower extremity blocks need to demonstrate ambulation with an assisted device before leaving the facility. They need to know how to operate the pump, identify infusate leakage and administer their own pain medication. They need to know our call numbers and understand driving and showering restrictions. We give patients extensive written instructions as well as a list of FAQs.

Conversely, we no longer emphasize acute local anesthetic toxicity symptoms. Experience has taught us that catheter dislodgement/migration results in a sudden decrease in analgesia. We now tell patients to turn off their pumps and call us if this occurs. With our low infusion rates and low concentrations of 0.2% ropivacaine, analgesia will disappear before any signs or symptoms of local anesthetic toxicity develop.

Call patients. No matter how much education we offer, patients tend to have lots of questions when they arrive home and begin the transition from the dense surgical block to the lighter, analgesic continuous-infusion block. So we call all continuous-infusion patients the night of surgery to ward off ER visits and patient disappointment.

Today, approximately 15 percent of our regional blocks are continuous-infusion. And while acute pain is still the leading cause of unplanned hospital admissions after ambulatory surgery, these blocks are helping more and more outpatients stay home in relative comfort. What's more, both these and the single-shot regional blocks have made my job more rewarding. I don't just put patients to sleep now; I interact with them. And they see me as a real person who cares about their health and truly alleviates their pain. This has done wonders for their satisfaction—and my own.

Dr. Enneking is Medical Director of the Florida Surgical Center and joint Professor of Anesthesiology and Orthopedic Surgery with the University of Florida.

Read Next Part >   

Brought to you as an educational service by
Newest Articles
A Breakthrough in Nerve Stimulation
William Urmey, New York, NY
Part 38
No Pain, Big Gain
Michelle Mattson, Durham, NC
Part 37
Article Listing
Part 36: Our Insurers Pay for Peripheral Nerve Blocks
Part 35: Fortifying Our Future With PNB Training
Part 34: Stimulating Catheters for Outpatient Surgery
Part 33: When Should We Use Stimulating Catheters?
Part 32: What Is Ultrasound's Role in Peripheral Nerve Blocks?
Part 31: There's No Better Advertisement than a Happy Patient!
Part 30: Avoiding Post-Lithotripsy Pain
Part 29: Regional Anesthesia Took My Pain From 10 to 0
Part 28: How to Make Peripheral Nerve Blocks Even Safer
Part 27: Helping Patients Understand Regional Blocks
Part 26: Ultrasound and Nerve Stimulation: Perfect Together
Part 25: The Post-Opioid Era
Part 24: Practical Pain Control
Part 23: In Our PACU, Blocks Made Miles of Difference
Part 22: Filling the Analgesic Gap
Part 21: Is Regional Anesthesia More Cost-Efficient?
Part 20: Prime Patients Early for PNB Success
Part 19: With Nerve Blocks, Time is Safety
Part 18: Nerve Blocks Improve Patient Well-Being
Part 17: The PNBs Have It
Part 16: Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: The Jury Is In
Part 15: Is Regional Anesthesia More Cost-Efficient?
Part 14: Block On!
Part 13: Regional Anesthesia: Lessons from Iraq
Part 12: Help is On the Way
Part 11: The Promise of Pediatric Peripheral Nerve Blocks
Part 10: Building a Better Regional Anesthesia Procedure Note
Part 9: Perception is Everything
Part 8: Peripheral Nerve Stimulators Improve Patient Comfort
Part 7: Regional Anesthesia Helps Elderly Patients Stay Alert and On Track
Part 6: 4 Ways to Make Continuous Infusions Run More Smoothly
Part 5: Tips for Managing Orthopedic Regional Anesthesia Patients
Part 4: How to Bill for Regional Anesthesia
Part 3: How to Ease Into Regional Blocks
Part 2: 3 Things to Know About Regional Anesthesia Programs
Part 1: The Case for Regional Anesthesia