Subscriptions Advertising Resources About Us Contact Us
Create An Account Retrieve Password
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month Archive Surveys CE E-Mall E-Weekly Building a Facility
Search OSM
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Bariatric Surgery
Building/Renovating
Business Management
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

New Sedative Closer to FDA Approval

The FDA's Advisory Committee on Anesthetic and Life Support Drugs last week recommended the approval of the IV sedative fospropofol disodium (Aquava...

Court Paves Way for Anti-markup Pathology Crackdown

CMS has been given the green light to enforce its anti-markup rule barring physicians from billing for off-site anatomic pathology services after a ...

The Incisionless Future of Bariatric Surgery

A minimally invasive bariatric procedure for patients who haven't found success with other weight loss surgeries is gaining ground in the United Sta...

Home > Archive > January 2008
Letters & E-mails
Who Should Sedate GI Patients?

Who Should Sedate GI Patients?
Re: "Anesthesia and the New Economics of GI" (October, page 45). As an anesthesiologist who administers sedation for GI procedures, and as an administrator with many years of outcome and safety focus, I am convinced that the participation of an anesthesiologist is not only warranted in many cases, but can definitely improve throughput, safety and (let us not forget) patient comfort. If you ask any patient her preference, most would prefer — and pay for themselves — the added comfort and safety of having an anesthesiologist. All GI RNs with whom I have ever spoken do not wish to participate in the battle to let them give the inherently unsafe propofol. To say that you have had airway instruction from a GI doctor is questionable, especially from a liability perspective. Letting an RN administer propofol with GI oversight is a dangerous practice in my opinion. The hybrid model described in the article is an excellent solution, from both patient care and facility efficiency perspectives.

Name withheld upon request

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
Categories: Op-Ed/Letters/Email
Other Articles That May Interest You
My Turn
MAC for Cataracts: A Question of Ethics
Editor's Page
So Much to Say, So Little Space. Where to Begin?
Letters & Emails
Propofol Sedation a Slippery Slope
44
Comment on this Article
You must be logged in to leave comments.
Recent Comments
You must be logged in to view comments.