Subscriptions Advertising Resources About Us Contact Us
Create An Account Retrieve Password
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month Archive Surveys CE E-Mall E-Weekly Building a Facility
Search OSM
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Bariatric Surgery
Building/Renovating
Business Management
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

New Sedative Closer to FDA Approval

The FDA's Advisory Committee on Anesthetic and Life Support Drugs last week recommended the approval of the IV sedative fospropofol disodium (Aquava...

Court Paves Way for Anti-markup Pathology Crackdown

CMS has been given the green light to enforce its anti-markup rule barring physicians from billing for off-site anatomic pathology services after a ...

The Incisionless Future of Bariatric Surgery

A minimally invasive bariatric procedure for patients who haven't found success with other weight loss surgeries is gaining ground in the United Sta...

Home > Archive > October 2007
Letters & E-mails
Indecent Exposure?

If I were the patient on your September 2007 cover, I would be upset. The patient is not fully covered and probably shows more than is necessary for a front cover photo.

Susan Liptak, RN
Director of Nursing
San Antonio Ambulatory Surgery Center
Upland, Calif.
writeMail("sue@sanantonioasc.com")

Do you realize that the right breast of the patient on September's cover is exposed?

Mary Lynn, RN
Administrator
Ocean Springs Surgical & Endoscopy Center
Ocean Springs, Miss.
writeMail("mlynn@ossurgical.com")

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
Categories: Op-Ed/Letters/Email
Other Articles That May Interest You
Letters & E-mails
SGNA clarifies propofol statement
Editor's Page
Man Enough or Smart Enough?
Letters & Emails
Anesthesiologists vs. CRNAs
44
Comment on this Article
You must be logged in to leave comments.
Recent Comments
You must be logged in to view comments.