Subscriptions Advertising Resources About Us Contact Us
Create An Account Retrieve Password
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month Archive Surveys CE E-Mall E-Weekly Building a Facility
Search OSM
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Bariatric Surgery
Building/Renovating
Business Management
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

New Sedative Closer to FDA Approval

The FDA's Advisory Committee on Anesthetic and Life Support Drugs last week recommended the approval of the IV sedative fospropofol disodium (Aquava...

Court Paves Way for Anti-markup Pathology Crackdown

CMS has been given the green light to enforce its anti-markup rule barring physicians from billing for off-site anatomic pathology services after a ...

The Incisionless Future of Bariatric Surgery

A minimally invasive bariatric procedure for patients who haven't found success with other weight loss surgeries is gaining ground in the United Sta...

Home > Archive > March 2007
Infection Control
Are You Reprocessing Laryngoscopes Correctly?
Chris Ekern, RN, and Karen Penn, RN

Sometimes, it's easy to forget that even non-invasive, easy-to-reprocess instruments can pose a cross-contamination and infection risk. A sobering example: After two premature babies died at White Memorial Medical Center in December, Los Angeles public health investigators linked their deaths to contaminated laryngoscope blades. In published reports, the California hospital said that the outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which sickened five other infants, was the result of a break in laryngoscope reprocessing protocol.

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
Categories: ENT, Other Surgery
Other Articles That May Interest You
This Just In
Thinking of Buying...Power Tools
How much speed, power and torque do you need?
If You're Thinking of Buying...
Power Tools
47
Comment on this Article
You must be logged in to leave comments.
Recent Comments
This article has 3 comment(s).
You must be logged in to view them.