Subscriptions Advertising Resources About Us Contact Us
Create An Account Forgot Your Password?
Trouble logging in or creating an account? click here
Home This Month E-Weekly Newsletter Building a Facility Article Archive Products & Services
Search OSM
Accrediting/Quality
Anesthesia
Bariatric Surgery
Building/Renovating
Business Management
Code/Bill/Reimburse
Outpatient Surgery E-Weekly

California Hospitals Fined for Safety Violations

California's Department of Public Health has fined 18 hospitals $25,000 per incident for failing to comply with state laws overseeing patient safety...

What Happens When Opioids Backfire?

It's a rare and challenging pain management paradox: opioid drugs, designed to relieve acute and chronic pain, can have the reverse effect in some p...

Safer, Synthetic Heparin Developed

Researchers at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y., have built the largest dose of synthetic heparin ever created in a lab. The developme...

Home > Archive > August 2002
Tips for Preventing Equipment Cross-Contamination
Infection control experts share their advice for keeping three hard-to-clean instruments pathogen-free.
Kristin McKee, Associate Editor
The endoscopes that doctors at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit used toperform nasal pharyngoscopy tests on 268 patients may have been contaminatedwith hepatitis B or C, according to a recent newspaper report. The culpritin this case of cross-contamination? A foam-padded suitcase where theendoscopes were stored had become a hepatitis breeding ground.What about your facility? Are you doing all you can to preventcross-contamination? We ask infection control experts how to prevent theproblem from occurring with these three hard-to-clean instruments:
  • flexible endoscopes
  • biopsy forceps
  • laryngoscopes blades and handles


Flexible endoscopes
Flexible endoscopes are a notorious source of cross-contamination, theirlong, narrow channels a challenge to reprocess. If not properly cleaned,flexible endoscopes can spread any number of infectious diseases, includingbloodborne viruses such as HIV and hepatitis B and C, as well as numerousother pathogens ranging from Helicobacter pylori from gastrointestinalscopes to Mycobacterium tuberculosis from ENT scopes.

We asked Steve Goldstine, PhD, a senior scientist who manages microbiologyat Olympus America, Inc., to share some common mistakes to avoid whenreprocessing endoscopes.
  • Failing to reprocess all internal channels, including the specializedones, every time you reprocess the scope. Sometimes, channels that were notused during the procedure will not be reprocessed.
  • Reprocessing sharp instruments, such as biopsy forceps, along withflexible endoscope. This can damage the device, allowing fluids to leak intothe channel, corrode the internal parts of the endoscope, and harborbacteria.
  • Reusing detergent solutions and rinse water during manual reprocessing.The detergent solutions and rinse water must be changed after every scope.
  • For automated disinfectors, not hooking up the endoscope to the propercorresponding connector.
  • Using chemicals and processes that are incompatible with your endoscopes,according to your manufacturer's manual. This may cause the scopes to bedamaged or improperly cleaned.


5 Steps to Cleaning Your Flexible Scopes Correctly



Biopsy forceps
Due to the tight coil-like windings and joints of biopsy forceps, microbescan become lodged in the crevasses, where disinfectant cannot penetrate,leading to possible cross-contamination. Like flexible endoscopes, biopsyforceps come in contact with numerous possible contaminants both bacterialand viral.

"Immediately after use, the forceps must be cleaned to remove mucus, tissueand blood from the instrument," says Dan Alt, a senior project engineer withECRI, a non-profit healthcare agency in Plymouth Meeting, Pa. Soil that isleft to dry on used forceps cause the device to deteriorate and make it evenmore difficult to remove this potentially infectious material. If you cannotreprocess the device right away, most manufacturers recommend placing theinstrument in a container of warm detergent solution until you can clean it.You may also want to try using an ultrasonic cleaner to remove any remainingdebris.

Laryngoscopes blades and handles
According to Kay Ball, an infection control consultant with K D MedicalInc, Lewis Center, Ohio, laryngoscope blades and handles are anotherpotential source of cross contamination. These devices are used like aretractor to open and illuminate the throat, allowing easy access for thebronchoscope. According to Ms. Ball, some facilities do not take the time toproperly disinfect laryngoscope handles and blades. Studies have shown thatnosocomial infections, like M. tuberculosis and pneumonia, can betransmitted as a result of inadequate cleaning, improper use of disinfectionagent, or failure to follow recommended cleaning and disinfectionprocedures.Here are some recommendations from the American Society of Anesthesiologistsfor properly sterilizing your laryngoscope blades and handles:
  • Begin cleaning the instruments with a low-sudsing enzymatic detergent assoon as possible after use.
  • Brushes used for cleaning should be disposable or should be cleaned andsterilized or undergo high-level disinfection at least daily.
  • When using liquid disinfectants for high-level disinfection, all internaland external surfaces must be in contact with an EPA-registeredsterilant/disinfectant for at least 20 minutes. And then rinse the equipmentthoroughly (including channels) with sterile water followed by a 70-percentalcohol rinse.
  • Nonimmersible parts should be physically cleaned with water and detergent,then wiped with 70-percent alcohol.


Consistently follow procedures
When it comes to properly reprocessing devices, Dan Alt advises to alwaysfollow the manufacturer's instructions, keep in mind the risk level of thedevice and look at the instrument's geometry. If you are dealing with anintricately constructed device, you are going to have to give careful timeand patience to see that it is thoroughly cleaned.

"In most cases, cross-contamination problems arise not because properprocedures were not in place, but because these procedures were not followedconsistently," says Mr. Alt. He recommends adopting a policy of bothadequate training as well as routine monitoring. He also recommendsconsulting your manufacturer's instructions if you have any questions aboutreprocessing instruments and devices.

Contact Kristin McKee at 610.240.4918, ext. 15 or kmckee@outpatientsurgery.net.

Already have an account? Please sign in:
Email Address:
Password:
Categories: Infection Control
PRODUCT & SERVICE RESOURCES
Product & Service Showcase
A showcase of products and services geared to make your facility better.
Professional Services Platinum Pages
A guide of people and companies to help make your facility better.
Facilities on Parade
A portfolio of opportunities helping you assess how your facility might look and work.
66
Products In This Issue
Other Articles That May Interest You
Safety
Alcohol-rub Dispensers OK to Mount in Hallways
What's New in Surgical Gloves
As safety concerns change users' preferences, manufacturers are offering more synthetic, low-protein and deproteinised gloves.
How to Track Surgical Site Infections
Tips for monitoring infection rates in ambulatory patients.
Comment on this Article
You must be logged in to leave comments.
Recent Comments
You must be logged in to view comments.